Bulletin du cancer
-
Review
[Use of telehealth services in the oncology setting: Daily routine and during sanitary crisis].
Telemedicine is booming with different sub-domains, including telehealth consultation. Pathology chronicity as well as the increased use of health services are two characteristics that underline the importance of telehealth consultation for patient's needs and health professionals. ⋯ To date, numerous tools are available to accelerate the digital transformation in clinical practice. In this review of the literature, we detail the historical and legal set up of telemedicine, focusing especially on teleconsultation and teleoncology.
-
Review Historical Article
[Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in acute oncology situations: History and regulatory aspects in France].
The management of oncology patients, especially hospitalized patients, can lead to almost daily discussions regarding therapeutic limitations. Here, we review the history and propose a summary of the texts framing the notion of "withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment" in oncology practice in France. ⋯ The decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatments is the subject of discussion between the patient, his physicians and his family and may take place at any time during his management. The work of intensive-care physicians provides many useful recommendations for acute oncology situations, however articles specific for oncology practice are scarce; this is a topic that oncologists must take up.
-
Review
[The role of direct oral anticoagulants in the management of cancer-associated thrombosis in 2020].
Direct oral anticoagulants, anti-IIa or anti-Xa, are widely used in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolic disease as well as in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants are characterized by a rapid onset of activity, a predictable response and a relatively wide therapeutic window. Nevertheless, theoretical drug interactions exist since direct oral anticoagulants are substrates of the transport protein P-glycoprotein and/or of isoforms of cytochromes P450 pathway. ⋯ Results of these studies showed a non-inferiority of direct oral anticoagulants in the prevention of recurrent thromboembolic events but at the cost of an increased hemorrhagic risk, in particular for patients with gastrointestinal and urogenital cancers. Thus, international guidelines, unlike French guidelines, integrate them in first line of the therapeutic strategy of cancer patients. We are certainly entering an era of personalized therapy for cancer-associated thrombosis, considering cancer type and also the theoretical risk of drug interactions with anti-cancer treatments or supportive care.
-
The advent of molecular biology resulted in the discovery of new oncogenes that have led to the development of targeted therapies for the management of cancer patients. The development of these therapies has improved the prognosis of patients in various tumour localizations. The TRK receptor (tropomyosin receptor kinase) is a transmembrane receptor with a tyrosine kinase activity that plays a role in both cell proliferation and the physiology of the nervous system. ⋯ Therapies targeting TRK, such as larotrectinib or entrectinib, have shown significant response rates, usually greater than 6 months, for tumours from various primary sites presenting NTRK fusions and refractory to standard therapies. These fusions can be detected by different methods: immunohistochemistry, FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) as well as NGS (next generation sequencing). The intent of this review is to report on current knowledge on NTRK fusions in oncology and to discuss the role of these fusions in digestive cancers and potential therapeutic implications.
-
The adjuvant treatment of biliary tract cancers has long been poorly defined. In recent years, randomized trial data have been used to define treatment references. ⋯ Although the results in intention to treat were borderline significant on the primary endpoint, overall survival (P=0.097), sensitivity analyzes adjusted for prognostic factors and relapse-free survival analyses are clearly positive. The absolute benefit of +5%/+10% overall survival, combined with low and known toxicity profile, leads to recommending treatment for any cancer of the resected bile ducts (with the exception of gallbladder cancer pT1N0).