Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
The effect of a first-generation antihistamine on sputum viscoelasticity in cystic fibrosis.
Tenacious airway secretions are responsible for much of the lung damage in cystic fibrosis (CF). Label warnings on potential secondary effects of some antihistamines include possible drying or thickening of lower airway secretions, suggesting that they are detrimental to individuals with airway disease. We studied the effects of cyproheptadine hydrochloride (CH) on sputum weight, viscoelasticity, and transportability in CF patients participating in a pilot trial of CH as an appetite stimulant to assure no potential adverse secondary effects on mucus clearance. ⋯ Weight on all specimens was obtained prior to both analyses. There were no significant differences in sputum weight wet, measures of mucus viscoelasticity (rheology), or cough transportability of mucus between baseline and 4 weeks in patients on placebo or CH. From this limited study, CH, a first-generation antihistamine, appears to have no adverse effects in sputum viscoelasticity or cough transportability in CF patients.
-
There has been much clinical and academic interest in the use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) in patients with acute and chronic respiratory failure. The use of NPPV in appropriately selected patients improves survival and decreases the need for endotracheal intubation. The most commonly used interfaces for NPPV are nasal masks or oronasal masks, but nasal pillows, mouthpieces, total face masks, and helmets can also be used. ⋯ However, in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that a significant amount of bronchodilator can be administered by in-line nebulizer or MDI during NPPV. The evidence base for aerosol delivery during NPPV is not nearly as mature as the evidence for aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation. With NPVV, issues related to the optimal interface, ventilator settings, and aerosol generator (nebulizer versus MDI) are largely unexplored.
-
Comparative Study
Jet nebulizers versus pressurized metered dose inhalers with valved holding chambers: effects of the facemask on aerosol delivery.
The delivery of an aerosolized drug to a child is a complex process requiring an interaction between parent, child, and inhalation device. Recent studies have shown that the facemask can be a key factor affecting aerosol delivery, particularly the influence of leaks between the facemask and the face. To further quantify these effects and design around them, we have developed a bench model consisting of a breathing simulator, an inhaled mass filter, and a "pediatric face." This paper reviews the development of this model and details important decisions made in its configuration, particularly inhaled mass filter location (e.g., between device and facemask, or in mouth) and mouth diameter (4 or 18 mm). ⋯ Failure to locate the filter in the mouth behind the face, especially for jet nebulizers, failed to accurately measure effects of the facemask and significantly overestimated aerosol delivery. Blow-by results indicated that a 1-cm gap between the facemask and the face was not critical when using a front-loaded facemask. Finally, even with optimal design, the combination of an aerosol generator and facemask with a crying breathing pattern reduced the inhaled mass to 1% of the label dose.
-
A facemask on a valved holding chamber (VHC) facilitates the inhalation of aerosols from metered dose inhalers (MDI) for young children. Only recently the facemask has been recognized as a vital part for efficient aerosol delivery. Several in vitro and in vivo studies show that a tight seal of the facemask is crucial for optimal aerosol deposition to the lungs. ⋯ Depending on the design of the facemask, it is easier to obtain a good seal. Factors such as dead space, shape, and material should be considered when designing a facemask. However, when a child is upset and not cooperative during the administration, aerosol deposition will be minimal, even with the best-designed facemask.
-
It has been shown in vitro that even a small air leak in the facemask can drastically reduce the efficiency of drug delivery. In addition, it has been shown that drug deposition on the face does significantly add to overall drug loss and has the potential of local side effects. The aim of this study is therefore to verify these findings in vivo. ⋯ Overall mask deposition was between 0.8% and 5.2%. Overall face deposition was between 2.6% and 8.4%. The results from this pilot study support the results found in in vitro studies, where a facemask leak greatly reduces drug delivery to the patient.