Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology
-
Neurophysiological techniques for the evaluation of pain in humans have made important advances in the last decade. A number of features of neuroanatomy and physiology of nociception qualifies pain as a multidimensional phenomenon which is rather unique among the sensory systems and which poses a number of technical and procedural requirements for its appropriate diagnostic assessment. ⋯ Particular emphasis is put upon laser-evoked potentials and their application for diagnosis, pathophysiological description and monitoring of patients with neurological disorders and abnormal pain states. Future perspectives in this growing field of research are discussed briefly.
-
Electroencephalography (EEG) and evoked potential (EP) studies are neurophysiologic techniques which provide information on physiological state and response to therapy, and may aid diagnosis and prognosis. Serial studies or continuous monitoring may enable changes to be detected prior to irreversible deterioration in the patient's condition. Current computer technology allows simultaneous display and correlation of electrophysiologic parameters, cardiovascular state and ICP. ⋯ Somatosensory and auditory EPs can provide useful prognostic information in coma patients, however, these tests are etiologically non-specific and must be carefully integrated into the clinical situation. Motor EPs offer a potentially useful tool for evaluating motor system abnormalities in the ICU. Thus, neurophysiologic tests are established monitoring tools in the neurological intensive care unit.
-
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol · Jan 1998
ReviewNeuromonitoring in the operating room: why, when, and how to monitor?
This review considers the main principles and indications of EEG and evoked potential (EP) neuromonitoring in the operating room. Neuromonitoring has a threefold purpose: to warn the surgeon that he has to adjust his strategy, to confirm his decision, and to help him improve subsequent procedures. The pathophysiology of intraoperative events liable to alter the EEG or the EPs is first considered. ⋯ Knowledge of them is essential to disentangle these neurophysiological alterations due to intraoperative events from those merely due to anesthesia and to use neurophysiological parameters to evaluate the depth of anesthesia. Third, the main indications and limitations of neuromonitoring are considered: prevention of ischemic brain or spinal cord damage, prevention of mechanical injuries of the brain, spinal cord or peripheral nerve, and localization of the motor cortex in cortical neurosurgery or of cranial nerves in posterior fossa surgery. Finally, the 3 levels of neuromonitoring (neurophysiological feature extraction, neurophysiological pattern recognition, clinical integration of the neurophysiological patterns) are discussed together with the rules that should guide the dialogue between the surgeon, the anesthesiologist, and the neurophysiologist.