Seminars in oncology
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialPaclitaxel (Taxol)/doxorubicin combinations in advanced breast cancer: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience.
Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), the first taxane to enter routine clinical practice, has aroused considerable interest due to its novel mechanism of action and its significant activity in metastatic breast cancer. Given this activity, it seemed logical to attempt to combine paclitaxel with doxorubicin, the other most active single agent in metastatic breast cancer. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performed two trials investigating paclitaxel/doxorubicin combinations in patients with advanced breast cancer in an attempt to identify a tolerable dose and schedule of the combination. ⋯ This suggests that sequence of drug administration in paclitaxel-based regimens may play an important role as a determinant of toxicity and (perhaps) efficacy, a finding similar to that seen when paclitaxel and cisplatin were combined in patients with ovarian cancer. Based on this study, we identified the sequence of doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) followed by paclitaxel (150 mg/m2) to be the maximum tolerated dose. This combination is currently being compared with paclitaxel alone and doxorubicin alone in patients with advanced breast cancer in an intergroup trial led by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialTropisetron (Navoban) alone and in combination with dexamethasone in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis: the Nordic experience.
Three Nordic multicenter studies were performed between 1988 and 1992 to evaluate the efficacy of tropisetron (Navoban; Sandoz Pharma Ltd, Basel, Switzerland) as an antiemetic agent in patients undergoing various types of chemotherapy. More than 1,050 patients were recruited from cancer centers in Sweden, Finland, and Denmark. In the first two studies, chemotherapy-naive patients were studied for 6-day periods over two consecutive treatment cycles. ⋯ The long-term effects of tropisetron therapy remained consistent over 10 consecutive courses of chemotherapy. Tropisetron was more effective during noncisplatin treatment compared with cisplatin treatment; it was also more effective in men and in older patients (> 50 years of age). The most frequent adverse events were headache (18%) and constipation (8%).
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA phase II study of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin augmented by vinorelbine (Navelbine) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: rationale and study design.
In a randomized phase II study by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, the cisplatin/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (PFL) combination produced a 29% response rate in advanced, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. Vinorelbine (Navelbine; Burroughs Wellcome, Co, Research Triangle Park, NC; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Paris, France), a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid, has also demonstrated single-agent activity in this disease. Therefore, a phase I-II study was designed to investigate the addition of vinorelbine in escalating doses to the PFL combination. ⋯ It was concluded that this dose level was not feasible. During a preliminary analysis, one complete response and three partial responses were observed in 16 patients evaluated; one of these patients had a pathologic complete remission. This early analysis indicates activity for the regimen.
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1994
Multicenter Study Clinical TrialPreliminary results of two dose-finding studies of paclitaxel (Taxol) and carboplatin in non-small cell lung and ovarian cancers: a European Cancer Centre effort.
Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) given as a 24-hour infusion, and carboplatin have activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ovarian cancer. Two dose-finding studies were initiated to identify the optimal doses for the paclitaxel/carboplatin combination when paclitaxel is given in a 3-hour infusion. The fact that the pharmacologic interaction between paclitaxel and cisplatin increases the toxicity of paclitaxel when cisplatin is given before it also prompted an investigation of the influence of drug sequence on toxicity and pharmacokinetics in the NSCLC trial. ⋯ No difference in toxicity has been observed thus far between the two drug sequences in the NSCLC study. Both studies are still accruing patients as the maximum tolerated doses of paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin have not yet been reached (carboplatin 300 mg/m2 with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in the NSCLC study; carboplatin 400 mg/m2 with paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 in the ovarian cancer study). An investigation of maximum tolerated doses with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support is planned thereafter.
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1994
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialHigh-dose ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide: maximum tolerable doses, toxicities, and hematopoietic recovery after autologous stem cell reinfusion.
We treated 115 patients in a phase I/II dose-escalation study of ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide (ICE) followed by autologous stem cell rescue. Patients treated had a variety of diagnoses, including breast cancer (high-risk stage II disease with eight or more positive nodes, stage III disease, and responsive metastatic disease), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, acute leukemia in first remission, and various solid tumors that were responsive to induction therapy. Patients received autologous bone marrow stem cells or peripheral blood stem cells primed by one of several methods. ⋯ Neutrophil recovery times varied based on the source of stem cells used, with the earliest engraftment times seen for patients receiving peripheral blood stem cells primed with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Platelet recovery times were not statistically different for any of the subsets. In conclusion, the maximum tolerated dose of ICE has been defined, and the source of stem cells and the use of hematopoietic growth factors influence hematopoietic recovery.