Bulletin de la Société de pathologie exotique (1990)
-
Bull Soc Pathol Exot · May 2010
[The Global Fund to fight HIV/AIDS, TB and Malaria 5-y: evaluation policy issues].
The Global Fund to fight HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) was founded in 2002 in the context of increased political and financial commitments towards health and development, in the aftermath of the Millennium Declaration, and on track to implement the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). As of today, the institution has mobilized over 16 billion US dollars through its partnership, and spent over 8 billion dollars through 620 contracts in 140 countries for these three diseases. Principles at inception were to accelerate and expand HIV, TB, and Malaria prevention and awareness, care, and treatment related activities, in the poorest and the most affected countries worldwide, with a special emphasis on Africa, being the continent with the highest disease burden, especially with respect to HIV/AIDS and its dreadful social and economic consequences. ⋯ Health systems' weaknesses at district level, such as human resources, laboratory commodities, and medicine shortages, are major constraints to further expansion of services and impact of funds. Issues at stake are the following: (i) soundness of the GFATM assumptions at inception with respect to national disease control strategies, especially in relation to HIV prevention, (ii) whether it belongs to the GFATM to finance health systems strengthening to start with, (iii) GFATM systems effects, (iv) misfinancing in relation to disease burden, marginalized and vulnerable groups, (v) technical expertise identification, mobilization and financing, (vi) equity of access of funding, expertise and guidance, to francophone countries in Africa. Recommendations are made to bring the attention of the GFATM Board members prior to the Replenishment Conference to be prepared in March 2010 and held in October 2010.
-
Bull Soc Pathol Exot · May 2010
Comparative Study[Imported malaria in University Hospital Center of Bordeaux, France, 2000-2007. A comparison study with the French national epidemiological data].
In Western countries, France accounts for the most concerned by imported malaria. The objective of the present study was to describe the epidemiological and clinical features of imported malaria in adults attending the University Hospital Center (UHC) ofBordeaux and to compare these findings with the French national epidemiological data. A retrospective analysis of all patients aged over 15 years with parasitologically confirmed malaria in patients recruited between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2007 has been performed. ⋯ Atovaquone-proguanil (AP) combination therapy wasmore frequently used in Bordeaux compared to the national data (64 versus 20%). This AP combination treatment was the most frequently prescribed for uncomplicated malaria, whereas intravenous quinine was mainly used for complicated malaria and for patients with vomiting. The lack of CPL, the diagnosis or therapeutic delay, and the lethality of malaria among travellers infected by malaria imported from SA argue for the implementation of continuing medical training and health education targeted at travellers from France to high malaria-endemic areas such as SA, Madagascar, and Comoros.
-
Bull Soc Pathol Exot · May 2010
Comparative Study Controlled Clinical Trial[Is oral rehydration with nasogastric tube more efficient than rehydration with spoon? Preliminary study in children with non-severe dehydration in Joseph-Raseta-Befelatanana Hospital, Madagascar].
Since its recommendation by WHO, Oral Rehydration Solutions (ORS) contributed in reducing the rate of mortality due to acute gastroenteritis. In Madagascar, the rate of lethality imputed to gastroenteritis is about 3%. Rehydration can be performed either by using spoons which reliability is unsure because of parents' potential inobservance and child's refusal, or by nasogastric tube. ⋯ No false passage or tube or ORS rejection was recorded in both techniques. This study shows that using spoon to rehydrate is more effective for the rehydration of moderate dehydration. The use of nasogastric tube needs more surveillance.