European journal of heart failure
-
Eur. J. Heart Fail. · May 2012
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyA randomized double-blind crossover trial of triventricular versus biventricular pacing in heart failure.
A significant proportion of patients implanted with biventricular (BiV) devices fail to respond. Clinical response may be improved by additional ventricular stimulation sites. This single-centre, double-blinded randomized crossover trial aimed to determine whether long-term multisite ventricular pacing is superior to conventional BiV pacing in heart failure patients. ⋯ TriV pacing was associated with significant improvements in clinical and echocardiographic parameters compared with BiV pacing.
-
Eur. J. Heart Fail. · May 2012
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyA randomized study of haemodynamic effects and left ventricular dyssynchrony in right ventricular apical vs. high posterior septal pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
The effect on left ventricular (LV) systolic function and LV dyssynchrony by alternative right ventricular (RV) lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is unclear. In the present study, RV apical (RV-A) was compared with RV high posterior septal (RV-HS) lead position in CRT. ⋯ RV-A and RV-HS in CRT demonstrated similar LV reverse remodelling and LV reverse dyssynchrony at 6-month follow-up. Concordant LV leads provided superior LV reverse remodelling and LV reverse dyssynchrony.