Current cardiology reports
-
Review Comparative Study
Comparison of Echocardiography, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, and Computed Tomographic Imaging for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Function: Part 2 (Diastolic and Regional Assessment).
Assessing left ventricular diastolic and regional function is a crucial part of the cardiovascular evaluation. Diastolic function is as important as systolic function for left ventricular performance because it is the determinant of the ability of the left atrium and ventricle to fill at relatively low pressures. ⋯ Technical advances in the imaging modalities have allowed a comprehensive noninvasive assessment of global and regional cardiac mechanics and precise estimation of cardiovascular hemodynamics. In this review, we will discuss and compare clinically available techniques and novel approaches using echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and computed tomography for the assessment of diastolic and regional left ventricular function.
-
The purpose of this review is to present an overview of the recent evidence regarding the use of bioresorbable scaffolds in percutaneous coronary intervention. ⋯ Bioresorbable scaffolds represent a potentially unique engineering solution to the problems associated with metallic stents. The Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold has been the most extensively tested of this class and is currently Food and Drug Administration-approved for use in the USA. While early studies suggested that it has comparable overall efficacy as compared to drug-eluting metallic stents, they also demonstrated a significantly increased risk of stent thrombosis. Bioresorbable scaffolds may be comparable to drug-eluting stents, though associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis. They are a nascent technology with several competitive product designs in development and continued iterative technological improvements are expected over the next several years.
-
Nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most widely used medications worldwide. There has been growing concern regarding the cardiovascular risks associated with NSAID use (both selective cyclooxygenase [COX]-2 inhibitors and nonselective NSAIDs). This review will examine the evidence pertaining to cardiovascular safety and bleeding risk related to nonaspirin NSAIDs. ⋯ Earlier studies exposed the cardiovascular risks associated with use of selective COX-2 inhibitors; however, further studies have shown that even nonselective COX inhibition may lead to an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Data have also suggested that nonaspirin NSAIDs carry a higher bleeding risk in patients on antithrombotic therapy. Nonaspirin NSAIDs may confer an increased risk of both adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding complications, regardless of COX selectivity and duration of use. Thus, it remains important to limit their use whenever possible, especially in patients with established cardiovascular disease.