Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy
-
In 2008, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) required all new glucose-lowering therapies to show cardiovascular safety, and this applies to the dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors ('gliptins'). At present, there is contradictory evidence on whether the gliptins increase hospitalizations for heart failure. ⋯ Despite the results of TECOS, debate over the effects of sitagliptin on the rates of hospitalizations for heart failure continues with some recent studies suggesting increased rates. Recently, empagliflozin (an inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2) has been shown to reduce cardiovascular outcomes in subjects with type 2 diabetes, including the rates of hospitalization for heart failure. In our opinion, these positive findings with empagliflozin suggest that it should be prescribed in preference to the gliptins, including sitagliptin, unless any positive cardiovascular outcomes are reported for the gliptins.
-
Expert Opin Pharmacother · Jan 2016
ReviewRociletinib, a third generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor: current data and future directions.
Major advances have been made since the discovery of driver mutations and their targeted therapies, especially in the treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Despite their initial efficacy in the majority of the patients with such driver mutations, all targeted therapies are limited by the eventual development of resistance mechanisms. ⋯ It is important to note that there are other 3(rd) generation EGFR TKIs with activity against T790M already approved by the US FDA (osimertinib) and many others in development. Future research will focus on figuring out which patients can benefit the most from a particular medication with minimal side effects, and further resistance mechanisms after rociletinib.
-
Expert Opin Pharmacother · Jan 2016
ReviewReversing neuromuscular blockade: inhibitors of the acetylcholinesterase versus the encapsulating agents sugammadex and calabadion.
Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (neostigmine, edrophonium) and encapsulating agents (sugammadex and calabadion) can be used to reverse residual neuromuscular blockade (NMB). ⋯ The therapeutic range of acetylcholinesterase-inhibitors is narrow and effectiveness studies demonstrate clinicians don't use these unspecific reversal agents effectively to increase postoperative respiratory safety. The encapsulating drugs sugammadex and calabadion reverse all levels of NMB, and complete recovery of muscle strength can be achieved almost immediately after administration. For this reason encapsulating agents can be used as a solution for "cannot intubate cannot ventilate"- situations. Poor binding selectivity of encapsulating agents carries the risk of displacement of the NMBA by a competitively binding drug, which may lead to recurarization. In order to avoid side-effects, related to unspecific binding of endogenous proteins and drugs administered perioperatively it is prudent to titrate the dose of reversal agents to the minimal effective dose, depending on the depth of neuromuscular transmission block identified by neuromuscular transmission monitoring. Calabadions provide a diversified (increased binding selectivity) and expanded (reversal of benzylisoquinolines) spectrum of possible indications.
-
Expert Opin Pharmacother · Jan 2016
Topical amitriptyline and ketamine for post-herpetic neuralgia and other forms of neuropathic pain.
Neuropathic pain (NP) has several therapeutic options but efficacy is limited and adverse effects occur, such that additional treatment options are needed. A topical formulation containing amitriptyline 4% and ketamine 2% (AmiKet) may provide such an option. ⋯ Topical AmiKet has the potential to be a first-line treatment option for PHN, and to be useful in other NP conditions. Furthermore, AmiKet has the potential to be an adjunct to systemic therapies, with the targeting of a peripheral compartment in addition to central sites of action representing a rational drug combination.
-
Expert Opin Pharmacother · Jan 2016
ReviewRifaximin and eluxadoline - newly approved treatments for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: what is their role in clinical practice alongside alosetron?
Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) is a common functional gastrointestinal condition in which patients experience abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloating, cramps, flatulence, fecal urgency, and incontinence. ⋯ The rifaximin and eluxadoline clinical development programs for IBS-D have demonstrated significant improvement in IBS-D endpoints compared to placebo. Direct comparison of primary endpoint results from the alosetron, rifaximin, and eluxadoline pivotal trials is not possible; however, general estimates of efficacy can be made, and these demonstrate similar and significantly greater responses to 'adequate relief' and a composite endpoint of abdominal pain/stool form for each agent compared to placebo. With the recent approval in the United States of rifaximin and eluxadoline for IBS-D, how should clinicians employ these agents? We suggest that they be utilized sequentially, taking into consideration patient symptoms and severity, prior medical history, mode of action, cost, availability, managed care coverage, and adverse event profiles.