The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Lacosamide in painful diabetic neuropathy: an 18-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
The efficacy and tolerability of oral lacosamide (200, 400, and 600 mg/day) was evaluated in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The primary target dose to be confirmed was lacosamide 400 mg/day. Efficacy was assessed by changes in pain scale scores from baseline, with changes over the last 4 weeks of the 12-week maintenance period regarded as the primary endpoint. Endpoint reductions in mean pain score were higher with all doses of lacosamide, reaching the level of significance with 400 mg/day (P = .05). Over the treatment period (titration + maintenance), pain relief was significantly higher than placebo with lacosamide 400 (P = .02) and 600 mg/day (P = .03). Lacosamide had an early-onset effect with significant reductions over placebo during the titration period. Nonparametric and mixed-model analysis approaches gave similar results, supporting significant efficacy at 400 mg/day. Secondary criteria such as Patient's Global Impression of Change, responder rates, and pain-free days provided additional support. Adverse events included dizziness, nausea, and headache. Incidence of cognitive and behavioral adverse events was low. This trial suggests that lacosamide has beneficial effects and may be a suitable treatment option for patients with diabetic neuropathic pain. ⋯ This study presents efficacy and safety results of a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the anticonvulsant drug lacosamide in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. Lacosamide treatment at a dose of 400 mg/day reduced diabetic neuropathic pain with a favorable safety and tolerability profile that may be suitable for patients with diabetes.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a selective COX-2 inhibitor, GW406381, in patients with postherpetic neuralgia.
In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of GW406381, an investigational selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor with both peripheral and central actions, in 209 patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Patients were randomly assigned to GW406381 25 mg or 50 mg or placebo treatments for 3 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the change in average daily pain intensity score from baseline to the last week of treatment. Both doses of GW406381 produced greater reduction in pain score than placebo, but the treatment difference did not reach statistical significance. It was possible that the 3-week duration was too short, as there was a tendency for increasing separation from placebo over time that did not appear to reach maximum effect by the end of the study for either GW406381 treatment group. Overall, GW406381 was well tolerated in this elderly population. ⋯ To our knowledge, this is the first report of a randomized, controlled clinical trial of a selective or nonselective COX inhibitor in neuropathic pain. The results of this study were inconclusive regarding the clinical relevance of the role of COX-2 in modulation of the symptoms of PHN.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Does the Neonatal Facial Coding System differentiate between infants experiencing pain-related and non-pain-related distress?
The Neonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS) is widely accepted as a measure of infant pain-related distress in known pain-specific contexts. It has clearly shown the ability to distinguish between facial reactivity in no-pain and pain-related situations. The primary purpose of this study was to explore whether NFCS differentiates between pain-related and non-pain-related distress. Two groups of 35 infants (1 group was distressed before injection whereas the other group was not distressed before injection) were coded using NFCS before and after an immunization procedure. Within-group analyses of infants who were distressed before immunization suggested that NFCS was not able to discriminate between pain-related and non-pain-related distress. However, between-group analyses showed NFCS discriminated between potential gradations of distress in infants after immunization. Results suggest that NFCS has the ability to discriminate between intensities of distress but not between pain-related and non-pain-related distress. ⋯ Adding to the NFCS validity literature, this study suggests that while able to distinguish between no-distress and pain-related distress, facial actions of NFCS may not distinguish between pain-related and non-pain-related distress expressions. However, NFCS was able to discern infants presumed to have higher pain-related distress due to experiencing pre-needle distress.
-
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
A single-blind, placebo run-in study of duloxetine for activity-limiting osteoarthritis pain.
Osteoarthritis pain is a significant problem for our aging population. Antidepressants that are serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors are effective for other forms of chronic pain and may provide a new treatment option for osteoarthritis pain. We performed a single-blind, placebo run-in trial of 60 to 90 mg of duloxetine in 25 subjects with activity-limiting osteoarthritis pain. Each subject received 2 weeks of placebo followed by 10 weeks of duloxetine. The primary outcome was reduction in average pain intensity between 2 and 12 weeks for subjects completing the trial. Average pain on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) was 5.7 at baseline, 4.8 after the 2-week placebo run-in, and 3.5 at 12 weeks for the 17 patients completing the trial (28% decrease between 2 and 12 weeks, P = .122). Eight of 15 study completers who had nonmissing BPI results (53%) reported at least 30% pain reduction between weeks 2 and 12. The Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score at baseline was 2.3, 1.8 after 2 weeks, and 1.3 after 12 weeks (30% decrease between 2 and 12 weeks, P = .018). Ten of 17 patients (59%) reported at least 30% pain relief between weeks 2 and 12 on the WOMAC. Significant improvements in self-reported physical and role function were reported but observed physical function did not improve. ⋯ Duloxetine did not significantly reduce pain intensity on the BPI but did improve pain intensity and self-reported function on the WOMAC. Duloxetine warrants further investigation as a novel treatment for osteoarthritis pain.
-
Multicenter Study
Validating PRISM (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure) as a measure of suffering in chronic non-cancer pain patients.
The Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM) is a recently developed tool designed to measure the burden of suffering due to illness in a variety of patient populations. The purpose of the current study was to validate PRISM as a measure of suffering in patients with chronic non-cancer pain. Patients (n = 138) were recruited from 2 hospital pain clinics, where they were participating in a 10-week, mindfulness-based chronic pain management course and during which they completed validated questionnaires to assess their outcomes. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating their PRISM scores with scores on the Short-Form 36v2 quality of life instrument, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the 0 to 10 Numeric Pain Scale. Content validity and test-retest reliability were assessed, and a factor analysis performed to identify relationships among the PRISM domains. PRISM was found to have good reliability and was significantly correlated with many of the subdomains of the other questionnaires. Qualitative data (n = 26) revealed that PRISM was well understood and that there was consistency in interpreting the task. Our data suggest that the PRISM task measures constructs relating to quality of life, pain catastrophizing, and pain intensity and probably measures suffering in patients with chronic non-cancer pain, providing a novel and quick tool for clinicians. ⋯ This study demonstrates the reliability and validity of the PRISM task for measuring the burden of pain in a population of chronic pain sufferers. Clinicians in the field of chronic pain management may find PRISM useful for monitoring the impact of pain management strategies on pain perception and the psychosocial variables that influence suffering.