Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology
-
Pharmacological prophylaxis of chronic migraine: a review of double-blind placebo-controlled trials.
Chronic migraine is an important public health problem. The aim of treatment should be to reduce migraine frequency and its negative impact on functioning, as well as to limit the use of acute medications. ⋯ The results of the review indicate that tizanidine, gabapentin, valproic acid, and particularly topiramate are effective prophylactics against chronic migraine, with improvements in several endpoints that were significantly superior to those achieved by placebo. However, the different results found by different trials, as well as several methodological problems inherent in the trials, suggest the need for further research to provide clear indications from large, multicentre, controlled trials with homogeneous inclusion criteria and adequate endpoints.
-
Since the publication of the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-2) in 2004, a fiery debate has been raging about chronic daily headache in general and about chronic migraine and medication overuse headache in particular. Based on a number of considerations and observations on the current state of knowledge, a proposal is advanced that suggests a few changes to ICHD-2, namely: (1) differentiation of migraine without aura at the second-digit level into infrequent, frequent and very frequent, based on frequency of attacks. (2) Inclusion of transformed migraine among the complications of migraine; this entry should be coded to 1.5.1 replacing chronic migraine and the only diagnostic criterion that needs to be changed over those already listed in the revised ICHD-2 (ICHD-2R) is its temporal pattern (more than 20 days/month for 1 year or more and never with more than 5 headache-free consecutive days). (3) Differentiation of transformed migraine at the fourth-digit level depending on the presence or absence of symptomatic medication overuse (i.e. use for more than 20 days/month) regardless of whether overuse played any role in the worsening of the headache. (4) Switching of medication overuse headache to the Appendix with other diagnostic criteria to be defined.
-
Management of patients affected by chronic daily headache (CDH) with medication overuse constitutes one of the most important unresolved problems. The uncertainty regarding the classification and the prophylaxis are a remarkable part of this problem. Objectives are to: (1) to evaluate the efficacy of withdrawal therapy following prophylaxis with topiramate and amitriptyline in a population affected by CDH and medication overuse with follow-up at 1 (T1), 3 (T2) and 6 (T3) months; (2) to identify which group of the Silberstein's CDH classification (1994) may benefit from this protocol. ⋯ At T3, all the patients free from overuse were affected by transformed migraine. Our data suggest that the patients affected by CDH and medication overuse benefit from withdrawal therapy performed during hospitalization plus prophylaxis with amitriptyline plus topiramate. This combination seems a good pharmacological solution to reduce the risk of relapse.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study.
The objective of this study is to assess patients' satisfaction with migraine treatment with frovatriptan (F) or zolmitriptan (Z), by preference questionnaire. 133 subjects with a history of migraine with or without aura (IHS criteria) were randomized to F 2.5 mg or Z 2.5 mg. The study had a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, cross-over design, with each of the two treatment periods lasting no more than 3 months. At the end of the study, patients were asked to assign preference to one of the treatments (primary endpoint). ⋯ SPF episodes were 18 (F) versus 22% (Z; p = NS). Drug-related adverse events were significantly (p < 0.05) less under F (3 vs. 10). In conclusion, our study suggests that F has a similar efficacy of Z, with some advantage as regards tolerability and recurrence.