Current pain and headache reports
-
The genetics of migraine is a fascinating and moving research area. Familial hemiplegic migraine, a rare subtype of migraine with a Mendelian pattern of inheritance, is caused by mutations in the chromosome 19 CACNA1A gene in approximately 75% of the families. ⋯ The genetics of the more frequent variants, migraine with and without aura, is more complex. Several loci have been studied in families and case-control studies, but need to be confirmed.
-
New daily persistent headache was first described by Vanast in 1986 as a benign form of chronic daily headache that improved without therapy. In the headache specialist's office, new daily persistent headache is anything but benign and is thought to be one of the most treatment refractory of all headache conditions. ⋯ It is unique in that the headache begins daily from onset, typically in a patient without a history of headache, and can continue for years without any sign of alleviation despite aggressive treatment. This article discusses the epidemiology, diagnostic criteria, clinical characteristics, and treatment strategies for new daily persistent headache.
-
Neuropathic low back pain is examined from a structural standpoint, distinguishing processes that start from chronic inflammation and mechanical compromise and cross into the realm of neuropathy with primary neurogenic pathophysiology. The disease of chronic pain is discussed, examining peripheral and central changes in neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neuromolecular dynamics. The limitations of inadequate random controlled trials regarding long-term pharmacologic interventions are contrasted with excellent work in the basic science of chronic pain. Complex rational pharmacologic strategies for structural pathology, central pain processes, sites of medication action, and differing routes of administration are delineated.
-
Curr Pain Headache Rep · Jun 2003
ReviewIs there a role for botulinum toxin in the treatment of migraine?
In this review, the studies and case reports that are available from reference systems and published congress contributions on the treatment of migraine with botulinum toxin are evaluated. The studies and reports were analyzed with respect to the study design, the efficacy parameters, and the significance of results. ⋯ As a result of this analysis, there is no sufficient scientific evidence for a treatment recommendation of migraine with botulinum toxin. Further studies are needed for a definite evaluation of subgroups with probable benefit from such a treatment and for the comparison of botulinum toxin with other migraine prophylactic drugs.