The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
Acquired hyperpneumatization of the skull base and upper cervical vertebrae is extremely rare and is thought to occur in patients who habitually perform the Valsalva maneuver or engage in repetitive positive pressure activities such as scuba diving or free diving. Craniocervical hyperpneumatization has been reported to cause intracranial and extracranial pneumatoceles but is not generally considered as a cause of pneumorrhachis (air in the spinal canal). Pneumorrhachis is relatively rare, and usually occurs in a localized form, either in the cervical spine secondary to skull base fractures or in the thoracic spine secondary to pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax. Here, we report a case of extensive pneumorrhachis extending from the skull base to the thoracolumbar junction in association with marked axio-atlanto-occipital hyperpneumatization and pneumomediastinum. This unique constellation of findings likely resulted from complications of the Valsalva maneuver during strenuous exercise. ⋯ Craniocervical hyperpneumatization is a rare complication of the Valsalva maneuver. Most reported cases have involved only the skull base, or the skull base and C1, and many have been further complicated by microfractures leading to pneumocephalus or extracranial pneumatoceles. We present a unique case of extensive craniocervical hyperpneumatization that extended to the level of C2 and was complicated by microfractures causing severe pneumorrhachis. Concurrent pneumomediastinum in this case may have been an independent complication of the Valsalva maneuver, which could have contributed to pneumorrhachis. Alternatively, pneumomediastinum may have been caused by migration of gas through the neural foramen from the epidural space, driven by positive pressure generated by the one-way valve effect of the Eustachian tube during periods of exertion.
-
The management of postoperative spinal wound complication remains a challenge, with surgical site infection (SSI) incidence rates ranging from 0.4% to 20% after spinal surgery. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been highlighted as an intervention that may stimulate healing and prevent SSI. However, the wound healing mechanism by NPWT and its effectiveness in spinal wounds still remain unclear. ⋯ Published reports are limited to small retrospective and case studies, with no reports of NPWT being used as a prophylactic treatment. Larger prospective RCTs of NPWT are needed to support the current evidence that it is effective in treating spinal wound complications. In addition, future studies should investigate its use as a prophylactic treatment to prevent infection and report data relating to safety and health economics.
-
Review Practice Guideline
An evidence-based clinical guideline for antibiotic prophylaxis in spine surgery.
The North American Spine Society's (NASS) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline on Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Spine Surgery provides evidence-based recommendations to address key clinical questions regarding the efficacy and the appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis protocol to prevent surgical site infections in patients undergoing spine surgery. The guideline is intended to address these questions based on the highest quality clinical literature available on this subject as of June 2011. ⋯ The clinical guideline for antibiotic prophylaxis in spine surgery has been created using the techniques of evidence-based medicine and best available evidence to aid practitioners in the care of patients undergoing spine surgery. The entire guideline document, including the evidentiary tables, suggestions for future research, and all the references, is available electronically on the NASS Web site at http://www.spine.org/Pages/PracticePolicy/ClinicalCare/ClinicalGuidlines/Default.aspx and will remain updated on a timely schedule.
-
In the instrumented fusion, adjacent segment facet joint violation or impingement by pedicle screws is unavoidable especially in cephalad segment, despite taking specific intraoperative precautions in terms of surgical approach. In such circumstances, unlike its original purpose, unilateral pedicle screw instrumentation can contribute to reduce the degeneration of cephalad adjacent segment by preventing contralateral cephalad adjacent facet joint from the unavoidable injury by pedicle screw insertion. However, to our knowledge, no long-term follow-up study has compared adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) between unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw instrumented fusion. ⋯ In a minimum 10-year follow-up retrospective study of posterolateral fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis and/or Grade 1 spondylolisthesis, unilateral pedicle screw instrumentation showed a lower rate of radiologic ASD, especially in second cephalad adjacent segment, and a better clinical outcome by ODI.
-
A new device, DensiProbe, has been developed to provide surgeons with intraoperative information about bone strength by measuring the peak breakaway torque. In cases of low bone quality, the treatment can be adapted to the patient's condition, for example, by improving screw-anchorage with augmentation techniques. ⋯ The intraoperative transpedicular measurement of the peak breakaway torque was technically feasible, safe, and reliably predictive of local vBMD during dorsal spinal instrumentations in a clinical setting. Larger studies are needed to define specific thresholds that indicate a need for the augmentation or instrumentation of additional levels.