The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Anterior decompression with fusion versus posterior decompression with fusion for massive cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with a ≥50% canal occupying ratio: a multicenter retrospective study.
Previous studies have shown that compared with laminoplasty, anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) is superior for postoperative neurologic improvement in patients with massive cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) with a ≥50% canal occupying ratio. However, it is unknown which method, ADF or posterior decompression with fusion (PDF), is more effective for the treatment of massive OPLL. ⋯ The present study demonstrated that the postoperative recovery rate was similar in the ADF and PDF group. In patients with massive OPLL with kyphotic alignment, neurologic recovery rate in the ADF was superior to that in the PDF (in situ fusion). Additionally, postoperative neck pain was less severe in the ADF group. However, the occurrence of perioperative complications was more common in the ADF group.