Articles: analgesics.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialAn evaluation of antidepressants in rheumatic pain conditions.
In a randomized, double-blind, parallel study, fluoxetine and amitriptyline were compared with placebo in the treatment of chronic rheumatic pain. A total of 59 patients were evaluated during 4 wk of treatment and received 20 mg fluoxetine, 25 mg amitriptyline, or placebo daily. Pain intensity, pain relief, vital variables, and global evaluation were used to assess efficacy. ⋯ At the end of the fourth week, fluoxetine was superior in efficacy to amitriptyline. The incidence of adverse effects was significantly greater with amitriptyline; dryness of the mouth was the most predominant side effect. We conclude that fluoxetine is an effective analgesic with fewer side effects.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Effect of varying intravenous patient-controlled analgesia dose and lockout interval while maintaining a constant hourly maximum dose.
To investigate the effect on the use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) of varying the dose (D) and lockout interval (LI) while keeping the hourly maximum dose constant. ⋯ The use of 1.0 mg with a 6-minute lockout may represent appropriate dose titration because this group obtained equivalent analgesia, morphine use, and side effects as the two larger dose and lockout groups. However, the increased number of PCA attempts and missed attempts may reflect lower satisfaction with PCA therapy.
-
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. · Aug 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEpidural administration of bupivacaine, morphine, or their combination for postoperative analgesia in dogs.
To compare the analgesic effects of epidural administration of morphine (MOR), bupivacaine hydrochloride (BUP), their combination (COM), and 0.9% sterile NaCl solution (SAL) in dogs undergoing hind limb orthopedic surgeries. ⋯ Postoperative epidural administration of COM or BUP alone provides longer-lasting analgesia, compared with MOR or SAL.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Alfentanil-mediated analgesia during propofol injection: no evidence for a peripheral action.
We have investigated if alfentanil acts via peripheral opioid receptors to relieve the pain which occurs on injection of propofol. Thirty seconds before induction of anaesthesia and immediately after a tourniquet at 50 mm Hg greater than systolic pressure was inflated on the upper arm, patients were given either placebo (n = 22), alfentanil 1 mg (n = 22) or lignocaine 40 mg (n = 22) via an i.v. cannula in the dorsum of the hand. ⋯ We found a significant reduction in pain after lignocaine compared with the two other groups (P < 0.001), but there was no difference between the placebo and alfentanil groups. We conclude that alfentanil does not relieve pain on injection with propofol via an action on peripheral opioid receptors when alfentanil is limited to the forearm for 30 s before induction of anaesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPreoperative wound infiltration with bupivacaine reduces early and late opioid requirement after hysterectomy.
We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate the early and late analgesic effect of preoperative wound infiltration with bupivacaine 0.25% (40 mL) compared to placebo (NaCl 0.9%, 40 mL) in patients undergoing major surgery. Forty-one patients scheduled for elective hysterectomy during general anesthesia were included. The pain management focused on pain prevention, including preoperative administration of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and peroperative administration of opioids. ⋯ With identical pain scores in the two groups, the requested total amount of buprenorphine was greater in the placebo group (2.0 [0-5.1] mg) (median and [range]) than in the bupivacaine group (0.8 [0-2.8] mg) (P < 0.05). The demand for analgesics occurred earlier in those who received placebo (225 min) than in those who received bupivacaine (345 min), but did not reach the level of significance. In conclusion, preoperative wound infiltration with bupivacaine improved immediate and late postoperative pain management after hysterectomy compared to placebo.