Articles: analgesics.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Apr 1988
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialEpidural sufentanil for intra- and postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery: a comparative study with intravenous sufentanil.
A comparative study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of epidural sufentanil in providing intra- and postoperative analgesia during thoracic surgery. Sufentanil was chosen on the basis of its high lipid solubility and its potent opiate receptor binding. Epidural sufentanil was compared with intravenous sufentanil as the major intraoperative analgetic agent in an anesthesia regimen with midazolam and nitrous oxide. ⋯ Sufentanil provided good analgesia with a very fast onset and a mean duration of almost 7 h. Severe respiratory depression was observed in one patient within 1 h of extubation, probably due to the combined effects of the narcotic administration and residual midazolam. It is concluded that 50 micrograms of sufentanil administered in the thoracic epidural space provides valuable intraoperative analgesia which can easily be extended into the postoperative period, although all necessary precautions for epidural opiate administration should be taken.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Lack of analgesic effect of opioids on neuropathic and idiopathic forms of pain.
The aim of the present study has been to assess the responsiveness of various types of chronic pain to opioids given i.v. and tested against placebo in a double-blind, randomized fashion. Pain classified as primary nociceptive was effectively alleviated (P greater than 0.001) while neuropathic deafferentation pain was not significantly influenced by morphine or equivalent doses of other opioids. Also 'idiopathic' pain, defined as chronic pain with no or little demonstrable pathology, failed to respond. ⋯ It may also support the indication and choice of invasive stimulation procedures (spinal cord or brain). The results of the study illustrate the misconception of chronic pain as an entity and highlight the importance of recognizing different neurobiological mechanisms and differences in responsiveness to analgesic drugs as well as to non-pharmacological modes of treatment. The opioid test has thus become a valuable tool in pain analysis and helpful as a guide for further treatment.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[Dose-dependence of the analgesic action of metamizol].
Whereas dipyrone is used in many countries in clinical practice at doses up to 2.5 g, the dose-response relationship of the analgesic effect has not been investigated in humans. In the present study, doses of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 g dipyrone (Novalgin) were applied orally as film-coated tablets to 18 volunteers in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind design. Pain attenuation was quantified following constant and painful electrical stimulation of tooth pulp at different time intervals up to 7 h after drug administration. ⋯ Maximal analgesia was observed 1 h after administration of the tablets, independent of the dose. An increase in analgesic effect related to dose was observed at this time, the increase being less pronounced with doses exceeding 1.5 g. Generally, analgesia persisted longer with increasing dose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Intrathecal sufentanil as a supplement to subarachnoid anaesthesia with lignocaine.
The combination of low-dose sufentanil with lignocaine for subarachnoid anaesthesia was studied in a double-blind comparative trial in 40 urological patients. Patients were allocated randomly to two groups and received 5% heavy lignocaine 1.5 ml together with either 1.5 ml of sufentanil 5 micrograms ml-1, or physiological saline 1.5 ml. ⋯ There was no significant difference in the number of patients requiring supplementary analgesics. Side-effects were similar in both groups.
-
J Cardiothorac Anesth · Dec 1987
Randomized Controlled TrialAnesthetic induction with fentanyl and intravenous lidocaine for coronary artery surgery.
In a randomized, double-blind trial, 59 patients undergoing coronary artery surgery received fentanyl 10, 15, or 25 microg/kg infused over 5 minutes for anesthetic induction. Half of the patients received intravenous lidocaine, 1.5 mg/kg, 1 minute before laryngoscopy. Efficacy of induction as judged by loss of consciousness was evaluated, and hemodynamic values during induction, laryngoscopy, and tracheal intubation were recorded each minute for 10 minutes. ⋯ Lidocaine partially blocked this restoration (systolic blood pressure 122 +/- 5 v 138 +/- 5 mmHg, lidocaine v placebo, 1 minute after laryngoscopy, P < .05). Fentanyl, 15 or 25 microg/kg, intravenously, is an effective induction agent for patients with coronary artery disease. Supplementation with intravenous lidocaine, 1.5 mg/kg, will obtund the increase in blood pressure that occurs with laryngoscopy and intubation and help prevent infrequent hypertensive responses seen with this opioid technique.