Articles: palliative-care.
-
Gallbladder cancer is the fifth most common gastrointestinal malignancy. Although overall 5-year survival is less than five percent, improved survival has been reported in recent years for extended resection of localized lesions. Nonetheless, one-third of operations for gallbladder cancer are palliative procedures. ⋯ Gastrointestinal bypass may be required for patients with gastric outlet obstruction. Although biliary bypass can be attempted to the extrahepatic biliary system or can be achieved by surgical intubation, there is increasing evidence that segment III cholangiojejunostomy provides effective long-term decompression of the obstructed biliary tree. A sound multidisciplinary approach is required in the management of these patients, the majority of whom are unlikely to survive beyond six months.
-
Palliative medicine · May 1999
ReviewPatient and carer preference for, and satisfaction with, specialist models of palliative care: a systematic literature review.
This systematic literature review examined the impact of specialist models of palliative care on consumer satisfaction, opinion and preference over the past 20 years. From the literature search, 83 relevant papers were identified. Research findings from North America did not reveal any reliable or consistent trends, and this was due primarily to methodological flaws in the research. ⋯ Even though research findings consistently indicate that consumers appreciate the psychosocial climate in hospices, this research was based on small-scale local studies which were mainly focused on a single hospice. The dearth of high quality, comprehensive research was notable on the impact on consumer preference, opinion or satisfaction of hospice home care services, and other forms of palliative care in the community. It was concluded that further research is needed into consumer priorities for patients dying of noncancer diseases, and into the possible impact of patient characteristics on consumer satisfaction, opinion and preference for specialist models of palliative care.
-
There has been a gradual shift in the attitude of the medical community as well as the lay public towards greater acceptance of euthanasia as an option for care of the terminally ill and dying. There have also been calls by certain groups to actually legalize voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide for patients who meet certain conditions, some of which are as follows: that the patient be of a sound mind, suffering from an incurable or terminal illness, experiencing unbearable suffering and uncontrollable pain. The rationale for legalizing euthanasia is based on the principle of the patient's right of self-determination and the duty of doctors to relieve pain and suffering at all times. ⋯ Some even went as far as to suggest that euthanasia and palliative care be part of the continuum of care for terminally ill patients. When palliative medicine fails to fully control pain and suffering for the patient, euthanasia can be the logical next step in the continuum of care. This article seeks to discuss why the rationale for legalizing euthanasia is flawed, why euthanasia goes against the fundamental principles of Medicine in general and why it is incompatible with the practice of palliative medicine.
-
Despite evidence that doctor-patient communication affects important patient outcomes, patient expectations are often not met. Communication is especially important in terminal illness, when the appropriate course of action may depend more on patient values than on medical dogma. We sought to describe the issues important to terminally ill patients receiving palliative care and to determine whether patient characteristics influence the needs of these patients. ⋯ Few easily identifiable patient characteristics were associated with expressed concerns or needs, suggesting that physicians need to individually assess patient needs. Terminally ill patients receiving palliative care had needs that were broad in scope. Given that few patient characteristics predicted responses, and that the majority opinion may not accurately reflect that of an individual patient, health care providers must be aware of the diverse concerns among this population and individualize assessment of each patient's needs and expectations.