Articles: opioid-analgesics.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Intrathecal sufentanil as a supplement to subarachnoid anaesthesia with lignocaine.
The combination of low-dose sufentanil with lignocaine for subarachnoid anaesthesia was studied in a double-blind comparative trial in 40 urological patients. Patients were allocated randomly to two groups and received 5% heavy lignocaine 1.5 ml together with either 1.5 ml of sufentanil 5 micrograms ml-1, or physiological saline 1.5 ml. ⋯ There was no significant difference in the number of patients requiring supplementary analgesics. Side-effects were similar in both groups.
-
J Cardiothorac Anesth · Dec 1987
Randomized Controlled TrialAnesthetic induction with fentanyl and intravenous lidocaine for coronary artery surgery.
In a randomized, double-blind trial, 59 patients undergoing coronary artery surgery received fentanyl 10, 15, or 25 microg/kg infused over 5 minutes for anesthetic induction. Half of the patients received intravenous lidocaine, 1.5 mg/kg, 1 minute before laryngoscopy. Efficacy of induction as judged by loss of consciousness was evaluated, and hemodynamic values during induction, laryngoscopy, and tracheal intubation were recorded each minute for 10 minutes. ⋯ Lidocaine partially blocked this restoration (systolic blood pressure 122 +/- 5 v 138 +/- 5 mmHg, lidocaine v placebo, 1 minute after laryngoscopy, P < .05). Fentanyl, 15 or 25 microg/kg, intravenously, is an effective induction agent for patients with coronary artery disease. Supplementation with intravenous lidocaine, 1.5 mg/kg, will obtund the increase in blood pressure that occurs with laryngoscopy and intubation and help prevent infrequent hypertensive responses seen with this opioid technique.
-
J Cardiothorac Anesth · Dec 1987
Randomized Controlled TrialThe role of intrathecal morphine in the anesthetic management of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.
The study was undertaken to assess the effects of intrathecal morphine (ITM) on perioperative hemodynamics, and anesthetic and postoperative analgesic requirements in patients anesthetized with fentanyl/enflurane undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Forty patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either intrathecal morphine or saline. Nineteen patients received ITM, 0.02 mg/ kg, and 21 intrathecal saline (ITS) after induction of anesthesia. ⋯ No significant difference was found between ITM and ITS groups for postoperative requirements of morphine (3.5 +/- 0.5 v 4.5 +/- 0.6 mg), diazepam (5.6 +/-1.25 v 3.9 +/- 1.26 mg), and vasodilators (6 v 13 patients), respectively. Comparable and significant reductions of peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR), forced vital capacity (FVC), and forced expiratory volume (FEV1) occurred in both groups postextubation when compared with preoperative values. Intrathecal morphine at the dose of 0.02 mg/kg does not offer any clear benefit to patients anesthetized with fentanyl, 40 microg/kg, for coronary artery bypass surgery.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Epidural sufentanil versus intramuscular buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia. A double-blind comparative trial.
Epidural sufentanil 50 micrograms was compared with intramuscular buprenorphine 0.3 mg for postoperative pain relief. Patients were assigned randomly to one of two treatment groups and received both an intramuscular and epidural injection, one of which was a placebo. ⋯ Cardiovascular variables remained stable in all patients and no respiratory depression was observed. Side effects were more frequent following buprenorphine.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Patient-controlled postoperative analgesia with alfentanil. Adaptive, on-demand intravenous alfentanil or pethidine compared double-blind for postoperative pain.
A double-blind study comparing alfentanil and pethidine given intravenously by an adaptive, patient-controlled on-demand analgesic system is described. It was demonstrated that, despite its well-known rapid onset of effect, alfentanil took several hours to achieve good quality analgesia. ⋯ Alfentanil was associated with significantly less sedation during the postoperative period than pethidine, and was also associated with a significantly greater urine output during the 24-hour period of study. There was no evidence of tolerance or accumulation with either of the two drugs.