Articles: analgesia.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Apr 1995
Levels of anaesthesia and intraoperative pain at caesarean section under regional block.
This prospective study recorded levels of analgesia (loss of sharp pin prick sensation) and anaesthesia (loss of touch sensation) in 220 women during caesarean section under regional anaesthesia (70 epidurals, 150 spinals). At delivery the difference between analgesia and anaesthesia varied from 0-7 segments for epidurals and 0-9 segments for spinals. ⋯ No patient with a level of anaesthesia which remained above T5 experienced pain. These results indicate that assessing the adequacy of block by sharp pin prick may be misleading and that in the absence of spinal or epidural narcotics a level of anaesthesia up to and including T5 is required to prevent pain during caesarean section.
-
A 30-year-old woman was admitted to the labour ward at term complaining of symptoms suggestive of raised intracranial pressure which were overlooked. Epidural analgesia was administered following induction of labour and was associated with a clear exacerbation of symptoms. After delivery a CT scan revealed a large cerebello-pontine angle tumour with obstructive hydrocephalus. This case report and literature review demonstrate the importance of a reasonable level of clinical suspicion and a careful neurological examination in patients with such symptomatology to allow sensible and safe guidance through labour.
-
The concept and value of 'multimodal' or 'balanced' analgesia in the treatment of postoperative pain is reviewed. Based upon the relatively few multimodal studies compared to unimodal studies, it is concluded that a combination of analgesics will improve pain relief including movement-associated pain. Since analgesic combination therapy is rational, further studies are needed to evaluate the optimal combination for each surgical procedure, as well as to assess the risk of side effects and need for surveillance in large-scale studies.
-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Apr 1995
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPostthoracotomy pulmonary function: a comparison of epidural versus intravenous meperidine infusions.
It has remained unclear whether epidural opioid analgesia permits better recovery of postthoracotomy pulmonary function than an optimal method of systemic opioid administration. Lumbar epidural meperidine infusions were compared with intravenous patient-controlled analgesic (PCA) meperidine infusions in a prospective randomized unblinded study for 72 hours postthoracotomy. Before induction of general anesthesia, patients received a bolus of meperidine, 1 mg/kg, and an infusion of meperidine, 0.33 mg/kg/hr, was started via either a lumbar epidural or intravenous catheter. ⋯ Normeperidine levels greater than 300 ng/mL were associated with an increased incidence of shakiness and/or tremors. Meperidine provides satisfactory postthoracotomy analgesia via a lumbar epidural infusion. This analgesia is associated with improved recovery of postoperative pulmonary function when compared with an intravenous PCA meperidine infusion.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Postoperative analgesia with transdermal fentanyl following lower abdominal surgery.
In a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study involving 81 patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy, the postoperative analgesia provided by transdermal fentanyl given at 25, 50, or 75 micrograms.h-1 for 72 h was compared with a placebo group. The efficacy of the Transdermal Therapeutic System was related to the rate of fentanyl delivery, higher rates being associated with significantly lower visual analogue pain scores (24, 20, 17 and 13, for placebo, 25, 50 and 75 micrograms.h-1 respectively) and reduced patient controlled analgesia morphine requirements (44, 38, 33 and 31 mg respectively). Patients' overall sedation scores were not increased by transdermal fentanyl, but respiratory rates decreased with higher transdermal fentanyl dosage.