Articles: traumatic-brain-injuries.
-
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is widely recognized as a major cause of death and disability. Optimizing recovery from coma is a priority for improving patient prognosis. Recently, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that median nerve electrical stimulation (MNES) may be a potential approach for comatose patients awakening with TBI, although the results of these studies are not consistent. ⋯ Furthermore, no significant differences in complications between the two groups of patients were observed, including pneumonitis (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.03; P = 0.107), seizures (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.49-3.10; P = 0.651), or gastric hemorrhage (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.60-1.93; P = 0.795). The results of the present study indicate that patients with TBI in the MNES group recovered from coma more rapidly after treatment and at 6 months after injury. These results suggest that MNES is an effective approach for coma awakening after TBI.
-
In the management of traumatic brain injury (TBI), intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPm) is crucial for the timely management of severe cases that show rapid neurological deterioration. External ventricular drains (EVDs) and intraparenchymal pressure monitors (IPMs) are the primary methods used in this setting; however, the debate over their comparative efficacy persists, primarily because of reliance on observational study data. This underscores the need for a meta-analysis to guide clinical decision-making. ⋯ However, IPM may offer significant advantages in reducing the duration of ICPm and intensive care unit length of stay. EVD may be preferable for certain mid-term to long-term monitoring. The predominance of observational studies in the current literature highlights the need for further clinical trials to compare these interventions.
-
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents complex clinical challenges, requiring a nuanced understanding of its pathophysiology and current management principles to improve patient outcomes. Anesthetists play a critical role in care and need to stay updated with recent evidence and trends to ensure high-quality treatment. The Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines, last updated in 2016, have shown moderate adherence, and much of the current management relies on expert opinions. This literature review synthesizes the current evidence and provides insights into the role of anesthetists in TBI management. ⋯ Anesthesia for TBI patients requires a comprehensive approach that balances anesthetic goals with the unique pathophysiological factors of brain injury. Despite recent research expanding our understanding, challenges remain in standardizing protocols and addressing individual patient response variability. Adherence to established management principles, personalized approaches, and ongoing research is crucial for improving the outcomes.
-
Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and monitoring of brain tissue oxygen (Pbto2) in addition to ICP have been used in the management of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the optimal monitoring method is inconclusive. We searched 4 databases with no language restrictions through January 2024 for peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ICP monitoring with combined Pbto2 and ICP monitoring in patients with traumatic brain injury. ⋯ There was no difference in favorable neurologic outcome (risk ratio: 1.21; 95% confidence interval: 0.93, 1.58; I2: 45%; 5 RCTs: 512 patients; moderate certainty) and survival (risk ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 0.99, 1.21; I2: 13%; 5 RCTs: 512 patients; moderate certainty). We found no evidence that the combination of Pbto2 and ICP is more useful than ICP. The included RCTs are few and small, and further study is needed to draw conclusions.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Invasive and Non-Invasive Techniques for Intracranial Pressure Monitoring after Decompressive Craniectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The use of invasive or noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring post-decompressive craniectomy (DC) has been a continuous matter of debate. Accordingly, this meta-analysis aims to examine the existing evidence of both approaches and compare their impact among patients undergoing DC, guiding clinical decision-making in the management of elevated ICP. The databases used were Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase. ⋯ Whereas in the noninvasive sample, a mortality rate of 20% (95% CI: 15%-26%) and a good outcome rate of 38% (95% CI: 25%-52%) were obtained. It seems that the effectiveness of invasive and noninvasive ICP monitoring methods are comparable in post-DC patients. While invasive monitoring remains gold standard, noninvasive methods offer a safer and cost-effective alternative, potentially improving post-DC patient care, and can mostly be used simultaneously with invasive methods.