Articles: back-pain.
-
Energy-reducing spinal cord stimulation (SCS) approaches have the potential to impact patient experience with rechargeable and non-rechargeable SCS devices through reducing device recharge time or enhancing device longevity. This prospective, multi-center study evaluated the safety, effectiveness, and actual energy usage of differential target multiplexed (DTM) endurance therapy, a reduced energy DTM SCS derivative. ⋯ The use of DTM endurance SCS therapy in this study resulted in reductions in pain relief through 12 months, demonstrating that energy-reducing stimulation patterns can provide clinical benefit. Clinically effective, reduced energy SCS derivatives have the potential to impact patient experience through either reduced recharge requirements or increased device longevity.
-
Comparative Study
A comparison of steroid dose with or without local anesthetic in lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injections.
Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are commonly used as a treatment for lumbar radiculopathy. Currently, most research on comparative efficacy of various steroids in epidural steroid injections is focused on transforaminal ESIs (TFESIs). Through this study, we aimed to compare various steroid doses with or without local anesthetic in interlaminar ESIs (ILESIs). ⋯ ILESIs with non-particulate steroids provide moderate to significant pain improvement in the short term, with low-dose steroid mixed with local anesthetic being as efficacious as a high-dose steroid.
-
Low back pain (LBP) is a leading reason for opioid use and a closer examination of opioid use and productivity losses among these patients is needed. We identify opioid use trajectories using a group-based trajectory model (GBTM) and estimate productivity losses across the trajectories. ⋯ This was the first study to estimate trajectories of opioids in the two time periods before and after a diagnosis of low back pain. For the first time, productivity losses were also estimated across the identified opioid use trajectories.
-
Comparative Study Observational Study
Evaluating the representativeness of a cohort study of low back pain: Using electronic health record data to make direct comparisons of study participants with non-participants from the study population.
Representativeness is an important component of generalizability. Few studies have rigorously examined the representativeness of randomized trials or observational studies of pain or musculoskeletal conditions with regards to a wide range of factors beyond age, sex, race, and ethnicity. We conducted the first study of a pain condition that uses individual-level data to directly compare the enrolled study sample to the population from which it was drawn. ⋯ This approach can be considered as a standard method to examine the representativeness of study samples in pain research. PERSPECTIVE: This article illustrates how electronic health record data can be used to directly compare the representativeness of participants in a study of pain to the study population from which participants were selected. This approach should be considered as a standard method to examine the representativeness of study samples during reporting.