Articles: low-back-pain.
-
Health Technol Assess · Aug 2005
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative StudyLonger term clinical and economic benefits of offering acupuncture care to patients with chronic low back pain.
To test whether patients with persistent non-specific low back pain, when offered access to traditional acupuncture care alongside conventional primary care, gained more long-term relief from pain than those offered conventional care only, for equal or less cost. Safety and acceptability of acupuncture care to patients, and the heterogeneity of outcomes were also tested. ⋯ Traditional acupuncture care delivered in a primary care setting was safe and acceptable to patients with non-specific low back pain. Acupuncture care and usual care were both associated with clinically significant improvement at 12- and 24-month follow-up. Acupuncture care was significantly more effective in reducing bodily pain than usual care at 24-month follow-up. No benefits relating to function or disability were identified. GP referral to a service providing traditional acupuncture care offers a cost-effective intervention for reducing low back pain over a 2-year period. Further research is needed to examine many aspects of this treatment including its impact compared with other possible short-term packages of care (such as massage, chiropractic or physiotherapy), various aspects of cost-effectiveness, value to patients and implementation protocols.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
The transition from acute to subacute and chronic low back pain: a study based on determinants of quality of life and prediction of chronic disability.
Follow-up study. ⋯ LBP influences disability and quality of life more than RP. Disability is predicted by pain duration and quality of life is predicted by disability, but pain severity predicts neither one of them. Changes related to determinants of disability and quality of life, and to the prediction of chronic disability, appear 14 days after the onset of pain, supporting that cutoff point for considering a patient as being subacute.
-
Four important domains directly related to low back pain are: pain intensity, low-back-pain-specific disability, patient satisfaction with treatment outcome, and work disability. Within each of the domains, different questionnaires have been proposed. This chapter focuses on validated and widely used questionnaires. ⋯ For global perceived effect, we argue that the MCIC is most appropriately defined in terms of at least 'much improved' or 'very satisfied', instead of including 'slightly improved'. Finally, we argue that, from the point of view of cost effectiveness, every day of earlier return to work is important. The exact value for the MCIC can be determined, taking into account the aim of the measurement, the initial scores, the target population and the method used to assess MCIC.
-
Comparative Study
Predictive validity of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory in subacute low back pain.
The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (CPCI) was developed to assess eight behavioral coping strategies hypothesized to be important for pain adaptation. But the predictive validity of the CPCI has yet to be tested in a longitudinal study. Here, 321 workers on sick leave after a work accident affecting the low back pain (LBP) region completed the CPCI during the subacute stage (T1) of LBP as well as the Catastrophizing scale of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). ⋯ Catastrophizing and Guarding were the most strongly associated with depressive mood at T1 but at T2, only depressive mood at T1 predicted this same variable. Results indicated also that the Guarding and Catastrophizing scales were able to predict future work status. The present study clearly reveals the usefulness of Guarding from the CPCI and Catastrophizing from the CSQ, when predicting different outcomes of adjustment to low back pain.
-
The purpose of this study was to investigate the pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) with respect to the Erector spinae and the hip muscles in 87 patients with subacute non-specific low back pain (LBP) and to evaluate the relationship between the PPTs and disability. In order to establish reference values, 64 healthy subjects were examined with respect to PPTs and used as a control group against the group of LBP patients. The mean PPT values of the Erector spinae and the hip at all examined points of the LBP group were significantly lower (p<0.001) in comparison to the PPT values of the healthy group. ⋯ The correlation between having LBP or not in the whole group (n=151) and PPT, was highest at the L3 level of the Erector spinae (r=-0.710, p<0.001). When the group of patients with LBP was divided into two subgroups in terms of having an Oswestry disability index (ODI) lower than 40 ("moderate LBP disability") or an ODI higher than 40 ("severe LBP disability") it was surprising to notice that there was no significant difference between the PPTs of the Erector spinae and the hip musculature. This study has shown the possibility of the existence of muscular disorder in the lumbar part of the Erector spinae in patients with non-specific low back pain, but also reveals the strong inter-individual differences in muscular fibrosis sensitivity and pain behaviour related to gender.