Articles: low-back-pain.
-
J Am Board Fam Pract · May 1996
CommentChronic opioids for chronic low back pain--solution or problem?
The article by Brown et al does not provide data to justify long-term opioid use but does suggest a treatment option for the many patients who have chronic back pain and who want the help that our medical delivery system often does not provide. Having worked in a tertiary referral pain clinic that serves many low back pain patients who have demonstrated the ineffectiveness of chronic opiate therapy, I am strongly ambivalent about recommending prescribing ongoing opioiod therapy for chronic pain patients. The caveats about prescribing opioids for such patients are most appropriate (i.e., do not prescribe opioids for those who have a history of problems with opioid therapy or for whom increased intake is associated with decreased function); however, for patients who do not display these problems (and there could be many out there), I am sympathetic with the sentiments expressed by Brown et al. ⋯ If pain complaints are reduced and if function is improved according to the record (eg, patient is working) and the relatives' report, and if you, the prescribing physician, are happy, then a long-term regimen of opioid therapy is probably fine. Further controlled trials are needed to see whether this therapy works, and if so, what are the optimal agent(s) and dosages, what is optimal monitoring, and most important of all, who is the optimal patient who might derive not only analgesia but also functional benefit rather than compromise from this therapy. If we cannot make patients better, we must not make them worse.
-
Comparative Study
Recurrent or new injury outcomes after return to work in chronic disabling spinal disorders. Tertiary prevention efficacy of functional restoration treatment.
A large prospective longitudinal cohort study (n = 1204) to identify prevalence of new or recurrent injury and risk factors in a rehabilitated chronic disabling spinal disorder patient group with matched control subjects. ⋯ The present study suggests that even a sample of the most severe chronic disabling spinal disorder workers' compensation patients who complete a tertiary functional restoration program are at relatively low risk for either a recurrent spinal disorder or new musculoskeletal injury claim (with or without disability). No major physical or psychologic risk factors for recurrent injury could be identified in this large cohort. These findings argue powerfully against employer bias in not rehiring employees with previous chronic disabling spinal disorder or discriminating in pre- or reemployment on the basis of putative reinjury risk factors after an appropriate rehabilitation program. Literature review documents a surprising paucity of quality studies examining variables predictive of this important socioeconomic outcome variable.
-
An inception cohort design was used to study a consecutive sample of back-injured workers. ⋯ The Vermont Disability Prediction Questionnaire is a brief, easily administered and scored tool for identifying back-injured workers at relative risk for chronic disability. Such early identification should increase the efficiency of disability prevention strategies by directing them toward people who need them most. The accuracy of the questionnaire needs to be tested in a variety of different clinical and socioeconomic settings.
-
Low back pain (LBP) is a common problem that is costly in both financial and human terms. The impact of LBP on an individual varies greatly. For some, LBP is a minor inconvenience; but for others LBP is associated with significant disability and with psychosocial dysfunction for the individual and for the family. ⋯ Once LBP has occurred, the impact of the LBP on the individual and the family is influenced by the health-beliefs and coping strategies of the individual and the family. Distress appears to be secondary to physical restriction rather than pain, but the distress may aggravate the pain and thus the disability. The paper concludes with a discussion of the impact of health practitioners on pain-related disability.