Articles: low-back-pain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Responsiveness of general health status in chronic low back pain: a comparison of the COOP charts and the SF-36.
The objective of this study was to compare the responsiveness and assess the concurrent validity of two functional health status instruments, the Dartmouth COOP charts and the SF-36 in chronic low-back pain (CLBP) patients. The data came from 129 of 174 patients who participated in a randomized clinical trial of the therapeutic management of CLBP. Reliable and valid disease-specific outcomes, patient-rated low-back pain and disability, were used as external criteria (EC) to identify improved and non-improved patients. ⋯ Six of the instruments' nine dimensions are moderately to highly correlated (r=0.52 to 0.86), and the overall canonical correlation was high (R=0.9). In conclusion, both instruments seem equally suitable for use as outcome measures in clinical trials on CLBP. The COOP charts are faster to fill out and score.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Cutaneous injections of sterile water for the relief of labor pain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Randomized trial of radiofrequency lumbar facet denervation for chronic low back pain.
A prospective double-blind randomized trial in 31 patients. ⋯ Radiofrequency lumbar zygapophysial joint denervation results in a significant alleviation of pain and functional disability in a select group of patients with chronic low back pain, both on a short-term and a long-term basis.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The effect of a Mensendieck exercise program as secondary prophylaxis for recurrent low back pain. A randomized, controlled trial with 12-month follow-up.
A prospective, randomized, controlled trial with a stratification block design in which a Mensendieck exercise program was compared with the experience of a control group. ⋯ A secondary prophylaxis Mensendieck exercise program of 20 group sessions significantly reduced the incidence of low back pain recurrences in a population with history of the condition. However, there were no differences between the groups with regard to days of sick leave, low back pain, and function.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Randomized trial comparing interferential therapy with motorized lumbar traction and massage in the management of low back pain in a primary care setting.
A randomized trial designed to compare interferential therapy with motorized lumbar traction and massage management for low back pain in a primary care setting. ⋯ This study shows a progressive fall in Oswestry Disability Index and pain visual analog scale scores in patients with low back pain treated with either-interferential therapy or motorized lumbar traction and massage. There was no difference in the improvement between the two groups at the end of treatment. Although there is evidence from several trials that traction alone is ineffective in the management of low back pain, this study could not exclude some effect from the concomitant massage.