Articles: low-back-pain.
-
Meta Analysis
Efficacy of epidural steroid injections for low-back pain and sciatica: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.
The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of epidural steroid injections for low-back pain. Data was obtained using computer-aided search of published randomized clinical trials and assessment of the methods of the studies. Twelve randomized clinical trials evaluating epidural steroid injections were identified. ⋯ The efficacy of epidural steroid injections has not been established. The benefits of epidural steroid injections, if any, seem to be of short duration only. Future research efforts are warranted, but more attention should be paid to the methods of the trials.
-
Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Spinal cord stimulation for chronic low back pain: a systematic literature synthesis.
A systematic literature synthesis was performed to analyze the long-term risks and benefits of spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Relevant articles were identified through a MEDLINE search (January 1966-June 1994), bibliography reviews, searches of personal files, and literature supplied by a stimulator manufacturer. Two investigators independently reviewed each article to determine whether it met the following study inclusion criteria: 1) original data on return to work, pain, medication use, reoperations, functional disability, or stimulator use after permanent implantation of spinal cord stimulators in patients with chronic low back or leg pain despite previous back surgery; and 2) follow-up > or = 30 days for all patients. ⋯ At follow-up (mean, 16 mo; range, 1-45 mo), an average of 59% of patients had > or = 50% pain relief (range, 15-100% of patients). Complications occurred in 42% of patients but were generally minor. It seems that approximately 50 to 60% of patients with failed back surgery syndrome report > 50% pain relief with the use of spinal cord stimulation at follow-up; the lack of randomized trials precludes conclusions concerning the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation relative to other treatments, placebo, or no treatment.
-
Meta Analysis
The prevalence of low back pain in the literature. A structured review of 26 Nordic studies from 1954 to 1993.
A systematic review was done for all prevalence studies on low back pain in the Nordic population between 1954 and 1992 that could be identified. ⋯ A more stringent, systematic, and uniform methodologic approach to studying the prevalence (or incidence) of back pain is needed.
-
Meta Analysis
Methodological quality of randomized clinical trials on treatment efficacy in low back pain.
This was a review of criteria-based meta-analyses. ⋯ Although a considerable number of randomized clinical trials have been carried out to evaluate the efficacy of interventions in low back pain, their methodological quality appears to be disappointingly low. Future trials are clearly needed, but much more attention should be paid to the methods of such studies.