Articles: general-anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialCost comparison: a desflurane- versus a propofol-based general anesthetic technique.
The purpose of this study was to compare the cost of a desflurane-based with a propofol-based general anesthetic technique. Fifty ambulatory orthopedic surgery patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Premedication and induction of anesthesia were standardized in both groups. ⋯ In conclusion, maintenance general anesthesia with our desflurane technique was considerably less expensive than with our propofol technique. PACU stay was not increased using desflurane as opposed to propofol in our study. Desflurane offers a cost effective alternative to propofol for ambulatory general anesthesia.
-
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim · Nov 1994
Review[Prevention of cross contamination, patient to anesthesia apparatus to patient, using filters].
Concern for cross infections from patient to patient via apparatus is particularly relevant today. There are several ways to prevent patient contamination through anesthetic devices. Although there is no clinical evidence for using one alternative over another and each hospital establishes its own hygienic protocols, we have introduced the systematic use of filters with patients undergoing general anesthesia. ⋯ We describe three basic physical tests (passage of water, passage of smoke and increase of resistance when applied to the patient) for filters to be classified. The ideal filter is hydrophobic and does not increase circuit resistance over the amount specified. Four principles are emphasized in the protocol: 1) the filter forms a part of the patient, not the apparatus; 2) proper placement of the filter is between the patient and the circuit's "Y" piece; 3) the main purpose of the filter is to prevent contamination of the apparatus, and 4) if a hydrophobic filter is used with each patient, the use of a disposable respiratory circuit is not called for.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[The effect of different anesthetic procedures on hormone levels in women. Studies during an in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) program].
Different anaesthetic procedures that were used during an in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) program have been analysed in order to determine their influence on plasma levels of estradiol, progesterone, prolactin, and beta-endorphin and results of IVF-ET. METHODS. Fifty-four patients awaiting transvaginal oocyte aspiration were randomised into three groups: (1) anaesthesia with ketamine as an induction agent and analgesic (n = 20); (2) general intubation anaesthesia using thiopentone for induction and enflurane for maintenance (n = 18); and (3) no anaesthesia (n = 16). ⋯ CONCLUSIONS. The increased prolactin and beta-endorphin plasma levels associated with ketamine and general anaesthesia reflect a significant alteration of the observed hormone levels. When anaesthesia is indicated, we try to avoid general intubation anaesthesia in favor of ketamine.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[Effects of pressure support ventilation (PSV) or PSV+PEEP on the respiratory function during general anesthesia under spontaneous ventilation].
This study was performed to examine the hypothesis that PSV with PEEP compared to spontaneous breathing with a circle anesthesia system may have beneficial effects on gas exchange and work of breathing during inhalational anesthesia. Nine patients (age; 58 +/- 20 yr) scheduled to receive general anesthesia for orthopedic (n = 3) or ENT (n = 6) surgery were randomly assigned in a triple cross-over manner to breathe with a standard anesthesia circle system, 5 cmH2O PSV, and 5 cm H2O PSV above 5 cmH2O PEEP. General anesthesia was induced with thiamylal (5 mg.kg-1) and succinylcholine (1 mg.kg-1), followed by tracheal intubation. ⋯ PaCO2 was lower during PSV+PEEP, but the difference was not significant. This level of PSV or PSV with PEEP may have little beneficial effects on gas exchange in our study condition. The mean WOBp was smaller in the PSV with PEEP group but the difference was not statistically significant.