Articles: general-anesthesia.
-
Review Comparative Study
A comparison of general anesthesia and regional anesthesia as a risk factor for deep vein thrombosis following hip surgery: a critical review.
We evaluated the evidence in support of the suggestion that the risk of deep vein thrombosis after hip surgery is lower with regional than with general anesthesia. A literature search was performed to retrieve all articles which reported on the incidence of postoperative thrombosis in both fractured and elective hip surgery. Articles were included if the method of anesthesia used was reported and if they used mandatory venography. ⋯ All studies showed a statistically significantly lower incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis with regional anesthesia (relative risk reductions of 46-55%). There were no direct comparative studies in patients who received prophylaxis. However, between study comparisons did not show even a trend towards to lower incidence of postoperative thrombosis with regional anesthesia.
-
Biography Historical Article
[Affair of dentist Duchesne. Judgement that banned general anesthesia in dental offices].
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Long-term cognitive and social sequelae of general versus regional anesthesia during arthroplasty in the elderly.
This study compared the effects of general and regional anesthesia on cognitive and psychosocial functioning in elderly persons. Sixty-four patients between 60 and 86 yr of age undergoing knee arthroplasty were randomly assigned to receive either general or regional anesthesia. ⋯ The results indicated that there were no cognitive or psychosocial effects of general or regional anesthesia after 3 months in elderly persons undergoing knee arthroplasty. In this patient population, general anesthesia poses no more risk to long-term mental function than regional anesthesia.