Articles: general-anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Epidural lidocaine with sufentanil and epinephrine for abdominal hysterectomy under general anaesthesia: respiratory depression and postoperative analgesia.
The purpose of this investigation was to compare the analgesic actions and side-effects of a 50 micrograms epidural bolus of sufentanil and 50 micrograms epinephrine, with a control group receiving saline and epinephrine. The method employed was a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial involving 40 ASA I or II patients for total abdominal hysterectomy. All received 1.5% lidocaine with 1/200,000 epinephrine epidurally before operation, until a block to T4 was established. ⋯ Glycopyrollate was given to 11/20 patients in the sufentanil group vs 1/20 in the control group (P less than 0.01) following bradycardia and hypotension. Clinical respiratory depression occurred in the sufentanil group; 5/20 patients required controlled ventilation following apnoea greater than 20 sec. It is concluded that epidural sufentanil causes considerable cardiorespiratory depression in the setting of general anaesthesia, and should be used with caution in the spontaneously breathing, anaesthetised patient.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of ketorolac and morphine as adjuvants during pediatric surgery.
The intraoperative use of opioid analgesics decreases the volatile anesthetic requirement and provides for pain relief in the early postoperative period. In a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 95 ASA physical status 1 or 2 children (ages 5-15 yr) undergoing general anesthesia for elective operations, we compared postoperative analgesia following the intraoperative intravenous (iv) administration of ketorolac, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug or morphine, an opioid analgesic. After induction of general anesthesia and before the start of the surgical procedure, children received equal volumes of saline, morphine (0.1 mg.kg-1, iv) or ketorolac (0.9 mg.kg-1, iv). ⋯ The placebo group had a significantly higher VAS and OPS score and required earlier and more frequent analgesic therapy in the PACU compared to the two analgesic groups. Patients receiving ketorolac had less postoperative emesis than those receiving morphine. We conclude that ketorolac (0.9 mg.kg-1) is an effective alternative to morphine (0.1 mg.kg-1) as an iv adjuvant during general anesthesia, and in the dose used in this study, is associated with less postoperative nausea and vomiting in children.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A haemodynamic comparison of epidural versus intrathecal sufentanil to supplement general anaesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery.
The present study was designed to evaluate the influence of epidural sufentanil (ES) and intrathecal sufentanil (IS) on the peri-operative haemodynamic responses during abdominal aortic surgery. Twenty-four ASA Grade II patients without clinical symptoms of coronary artery disease received, randomly, epidural (n = 12) or intrathecal (n = 12) sufentanil combined with light general anaesthesia for elective bifemoral grafting for aorto-iliac occlusive disease. The IS group contained significantly more hypertensive patients than the ES group. ⋯ Revascularization produced significant differences in HR, SVR and CI in both groups in comparison with the pre-declamping period. Notable was the maintenance of systemic blood pressure following revascularization due to preservation of sympathetic activity. It was concluded that both epidural and intrathecal sufentanil produce comparable and stable haemodynamics in this category of patients.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of induction, maintenance, and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane-N2O and propofol-sevoflurane-N2O with propofol-isoflurane-N2O anesthesia.
Induction of, maintenance of, and recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia were compared with propofol and isoflurane anesthesia when administered with nitrous oxide to patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. Seventy-five healthy (ASA I or II), consenting patients were randomly assigned to receive either (I) propofol for induction of anesthesia and isoflurane-nitrous oxide for maintenance (control), (II) propofol for induction and sevoflurane-nitrous oxide for maintenance, or (III) sevoflurane-nitrous oxide for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Inhaled induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane-nitrous oxide was rapid (109 +/- 25 s to loss of consciousness) and without any untoward hemodynamic changes or episodes of coughing and laryngospasm. ⋯ The levels of fluoride ions correlated with the degree of exposure to sevoflurane in MAC-hours. In conclusion, induction of anesthesia with either propofol or sevoflurane-nitrous oxide was rapid and without significant side effects. Emergence and early recovery after maintenance of anesthesia with sevoflurane-nitrous oxide was significantly faster than that after an isoflurane-nitrous oxide combination.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparative evaluation of the neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of pipecuronium, pancuronium, atracurium, and vecuronium under isoflurane anesthesia.
The neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of intubating doses of pipecuronium 80 micrograms/kg, pancuronium 100 micrograms/kg, atracurium 500 micrograms/kg, and vecuronium 100 micrograms/kg were compared in 62 patients under isoflurane (end-tidal concentration = 0.5-1%) anesthesia. Pipecuronium, pancuronium, and vecuronium had no significant effect on systolic or diastolic blood pressure. In one patient the administration of atracurium resulted in significant hypotension. ⋯ The neuromuscular-blocking effect of pipecuronium and pancuronium appears to be twice as long as that of vecuronium and atracurium. Administration of neostigmine resulted in significantly faster recovery of muscle function in patients receiving vecuronium or atracurium. Although pipecuronium's neuromuscular-blocking effect is similar to that of pancuronium, its lack of cardiovascular effects more closely resembles that of vecuronium.