Articles: general-anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Accelographic train-of-four at near-threshold currents.
The authors evaluated train-of-four (TOF) fade, as quantified by accelography, in response to neurostimulation at currents ranging from 10 to 60 mA. This was done to determine the range of currents over which measurements of fade remain consistent. In 31 patients (ASA Physical Status 1,2, and 3), anesthesia was induced with fentanyl, midazolam, and thiopental and was maintained with isoflurane and 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen. ⋯ This inconsistency was eliminated by testing at greater than or equal to 10 mA above threshold. TOF ratios obtained at 10 mA above T4 threshold correlated highly with those at 60 mA (Spearman r value = 0.94). The authors conclude that the TOF ratio is consistent over a wide range of stimulating currents and that testing with submaximal currents can be performed reliably at greater than or equal to 10 mA above the T4 threshold.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[The effect of halothane, alfentanil and propofol on blood flow velocity, blood vessel cross section and blood volume flow in the middle cerebral artery].
Transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) has gained in relevance for noninvasive monitoring of the cerebral circulation during the perioperative period. As long as the diameters of the investigated vessels remain unknown, however, flow velocities alone are not really informative. Exact vessel diameter determination in humans under the influence of different anesthetic drugs has not yet been performed due to ethical and methodological restrictions. ⋯ LAR remained unaltered after alfentanil administration. The site of action of some anesthetic agents on cerebral vessels does not seem to be restricted to cerebral arterioles: at least for halothane, a vasodilating effect on large cerebral arteries could be demonstrated. This should be kept in mind when transcranial Doppler is applied during the perioperative period.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of transcutaneous end-tidal and arterial measurements of carbon dioxide during general anaesthesia.
A randomized, prospective study was performed to evaluate the accuracy of a new transcutaneous carbon dioxide (CO2) monitor (Fastrac) during general anaesthesia. Twenty-two adult patients undergoing elective surgery were subjected to three different levels of minute ventilation by varying their respiratory rates in a randomized cross-over design. Simultaneous measurements of transcutaneous CO2 (PTCCO2) and arterial CO2 (PaCO2) were obtained at three levels of minute ventilation (low, medium and high). ⋯ These differences were greatest when PaCO2 was in the high range (48-60 mmHg). We conclude that the new Fastrac CO2 monitor is accurate for monitoring carbon dioxide levels during general anaesthesia. The new transcutaneous devices provide an effective method for non-invasive monitoring of CO2 in situations where continuous, precise control of CO2 levels is desired.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Efficacy of therapeutic suggestions for improved postoperative recovery presented during general anesthesia.
There have been claims that the postoperative course of patients may be improved by presentation during general anesthesia of therapeutic suggestions which predict a rapid and comfortable postoperative recovery. This study evaluated the effectiveness of such therapeutic suggestions under double-blind and randomized conditions. A tape recording predicting a smooth recovery during a short postoperative stay without pain, nausea, or vomiting was played during anesthesia to about half the patients (N = 109), while the remaining, control patients were played a blank tape instead (N = 100). ⋯ There were no meaningful, significant differences in postoperative recovery of patients receiving therapeutic suggestions and controls. These negative results were not likely to be due to insensitivity of the assessments of recovery, as they showed meaningful interrelations among themselves and numerous differences in recovery following different types of surgery. Widespread utilization of therapeutic suggestions as a routine operating room procedure seems premature in the absence of adequate replication of previously published positive studies.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1991
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEfficacy of esmolol versus alfentanil as a supplement to propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia.
In 97 outpatients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic procedures, we compared esmolol with alfentanil when used to supplement propofol-N2O-atracurium anesthesia according to a randomized, double-blind protocol. After an initial intravenous dose of 16 micrograms/kg alfentanil, or 2 mg/kg of esmolol, a variable-rate infusion of alfentanil or esmolol was administered to maintain a stable heart rate. After induction of anesthesia with 2.5 mg/kg of propofol, mean arterial pressure decreased to a larger extent in the alfentanil-treated patients. ⋯ There were no significant differences in the incidences of nausea and vomiting between the two groups. The authors conclude that esmolol may be used in place of alfentanil to supplement propofol-N2O-atracurium anesthesia in outpatients undergoing arthroscopic procedures. However, hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation were larger with esmolol, and avoidance of alfentanil did not decrease the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in this outpatient population.