Articles: pain-measurement.
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of eight psychometric instruments in unselected patients with back pain.
A comparative evaluation of eight psychometric instruments was made in 274 patients who were currently suffering or previously had suffered from low-back pain. The specificity and sensitivity values for detection of psychological disturbance were calculated and optimum cutoff scores determined for each test. The influence of current pain, social group, compensation, migrant status, and unemployment on the accuracy of each test were evaluated. ⋯ The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety Scale, the Hospital Depression Scale, and the Zung Depression Scale were the most accurate and least affected by the factors examined. The combination of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire and the Zung Depression Scale yielded specificities and sensitivities of 91% and 84% for men and 96% and 85% for women, respectively. This combination is recommended for the assessment of psychological disturbance in patients with low-back pain.
-
In a clinical trial one scale of pain relief is scored backwards relative to another (high on one corresponding to low on the other), with a consequent large negative correlation. But two derived scales of total pain, obtained by multiplying average pain relief on each scale by duration of pain (common to both pain relief measurements) gave an almost zero correlation. This apparent contradiction is explained by the inverse relationship between the pain relief scales and the large differences in duration of pain experienced by the patients.
-
A convenience sample of 60 children, aged five to 12 years, reporting to Kuwait government hospital emergency departments was studied. All were native Arabic speakers. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic usefulness of the pain information provided by children and by accompanying adults when interviewed under standard emergency department conditions. ⋯ Most children provided useful pain information. Mothers received consistently higher scores for their VAS descriptions than their children did; otherwise, the pain data provided by adults were not judged to be significantly more useful. When clinicians and teachers were asked to differentiate which data they thought had been provided by a child and which by the accompanying adult, nearly half of their decisions were wrong.
-
Multidimensional scaling was used to explore whether a single intensity dimension underlies the perception of both nonpainful and painful electrical stimuli, or whether separate dimensions are required. For the scaling (INDSCAL) procedure, 41 healthy volunteers judged the similarity between all pairs of 16 intensities, which ranged from imperceptible levels to pain tolerance. For the property mapping (PREFMAP) analysis, they rated each intensity on each of 16 property scales. ⋯ Third and fourth dimensions, which refined the scaling of nonpainful stimuli, were also found. Variability in the subjects' use of the painful and nonpainful dimensions was related to their choice of stimulus descriptors. Like clinical pain, laboratory pain requires multidimensional assessment.
-
We studied correlations of pain measures in patients with either inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a disease with a clear organic cause, or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a functional pain syndrome in which there is little demonstrable pathology. Correlations were determined between measures on the visual analogue scale (VAS) and on the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). ⋯ This finding is similar to what we observed in our previous study of organic and functional pain syndromes in the musculoskeletal system. Correlations between the other measures are also discussed.