Articles: hernia-therapy.
-
Review Case Reports
Laparoscopic-assisted management of traumatic abdominal wall hernias in children: case series and a review of the literature.
Traumatic abdominal wall hernia (TAWH) is defined as herniation through a disrupted portion of musculature/fascia without skin penetration or history of prior hernia. In children, TAWH is a rare injury. ⋯ Traumatic abdominal wall hernias require a high index of suspicion in the cases of blunt abdominal trauma. Laparoscopy is useful mainly as a diagnostic modality, both to evaluate the hernia and associated injuries to intraabdominal structures. Its use may facilitate repair through a smaller incision. Conservative management of TAWH may be appropriate in select cases where there is a low risk of bowel strangulation.
-
Approximately 20 % of the population are affected by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The subjective clinical and objective pathological extent of the disease is highly variable and the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms extraordinarily diverse. ⋯ Currently, additional relevant pathophysiological cofactors are being detected with the continuous improvement in diagnostic methods and used for therapeutic decision-making. Despite standardization of the operative technique and increasing criticism on long-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, antireflux surgery still requires a very critical assessment of indications based on a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation.
-
Chronic exertional compartment syndrome can present either as anterolateral lower leg pain or as painful muscle herniation. If an athlete or a soldier wants to continue training, there is no proven effective nonoperative treatment, and fasciotomy of 1 or more of the lower leg muscle compartments is usually recommended. Our clinical protocol differs from most reported ones in the use of the forefoot rise test to increase pressure and provoke pain and our recommending minimal surgery of the anterior compartment only. We present results of surgery based on our clinical management flowchart. ⋯ Level IV, retrospective case series.
-
Doctors have no ethical obligation to provide futile treatment. This has been true since the time of Hippocrates who warned physicians not to treat patients who were "overmastered by their disease." This principle remains valid today but, as the Society for Critical Care Medicine notes, it is difficult to identify treatment as absolutely futile in all but a few clinical situations. Far more common, they note, are "treatments that are extremely unlikely to be beneficial, are extremely costly, or are of uncertain benefit." These, they say, "may be considered inappropriate and hence inadvisable, but should not be labeled futile." So what should doctors do when they have a case that seems close to the futility threshold but does not, perhaps, quite cross it? In such cases, is it appropriate to make unilateral decisions to withhold life-sustaining treatment even if the family objects? Or should treatment be provided knowing that it might cause pain and suffering to an infant with no likelihood of benefit? To address these questions, we present a case of an extremely premature infant with a giant omphalocele and ask 3 neonatologists, Dr Dalia Feltman of Evanston Hospital, Dr Theophil Stokes of the Walter Reed Medical Center, and Dr Jennifer Kett, a neonatologist and fellow in bioethics at Seattle Children's Hospital, to comment.