Articles: acetaminophen.
-
J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. · Feb 1987
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEffect of pretreatment with acetaminophen-propoxyphene for oral surgery pain.
To determine the effect of pretreatment and multiple doses on postsurgical pain, a study of the relative analgesic efficacy of placebo, acetaminophen 650 mg, and propoxyphene napsylate 100 mg alone and in combination was conducted. Forty-five patients undergoing surgical removal of impacted third molar teeth under local anesthesia were randomly allocated to the four treatment regimens under double-blind conditions. The first oral dose was administered one hour preoperatively and the second dose when the pain became moderate or severe, following the dissipation of the local anesthesia. ⋯ Duration of analgesia was also significantly longer with both propoxyphene-containing treatments. No side effects were reported. The results suggest that pretreatment with a narcotic agonist markedly improves postoperative analgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus oral analgesic: a randomized double-blind controlled study in acute traumatic pain.
A double-blind controlled analgesic study was undertaken in outpatients suffering acute traumatic pain. One hundred patients completed the study and were randomly assigned to four treatment groups, each receiving either functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators (TENS), placebo TENS, acetaminophen with codeine and a functioning TENS, or acetaminophen with codeine and a placebo TENS. ⋯ The TENS was approximately as effective as acetaminophen (300-600 mg) with codeine (30-60 mg) but had no side effects. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators have been shown to be effective in the management of acute traumatic pain and may be indicated for patients who cannot be given medications.
-
Acta medica Iugoslavica · Jan 1987
Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Clinical evaluation of analgesics in surgical patients in the postoperative period].
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Treatment of mild to moderate pain of acute soft tissue injury: diflunisal vs acetaminophen with codeine.
Acute soft tissue injuries create pain and limitation of function. Treatment requires analgesia and time for full recovery. Acetaminophen with codeine (650 mg plus 60 mg, respectively, every 4 to 6 hours) is used frequently as the analgesic of choice. ⋯ However, 65 percent of acetaminophen with codeine patients experienced side effects, with 35 percent of these patients stopping the medication because of intolerable side effects. In the diflunisal group, 28 percent of the patients experienced side effects and 5 percent had to stop the medication early. Diflunisal was found to be an effective analgesic in mild to moderate pain of acute soft tissue injuries, and caused fewer and more tolerable side effects than did acetaminophen with codeine.
-
Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh) · Jul 1986
Orphenadrine citrate increases and prolongs the antinociceptive effects of paracetamol in mice.
Orphenadrine, a muscle relaxant with antinociceptive effects, was shown to increase and prolong the antinociceptive effects of paracetamol in mice. Both in the increasing temperature hot plate test and in the formalin test, a combination of the two drugs showed a significantly improved effect compared to either of the drugs alone. ⋯ Orphenadrine and paracetamol increased antinociception even when orphenadrine was injected 90 min. after paracetamol, which by that time did not exert antinociceptive effects by itself. Thus the combination of orphenadrine and paracetamol enhances the antinociceptive effect of either drug in mice.