Articles: emergency-services.
-
To study the prevalence, risk factors, and consequences of ambulance diversion. ⋯ Ambulance diversion is a common and increasing event that delays emergency medical care.
-
Emergency department overcrowding may not be so much a result of inappropriate use of the emergency department as it is a problem of the unavailability and inaccessibility of primary care services in the community. The prevailing theory that people use the emergency department because they cannot afford care elsewhere does not hold true. The vast majority of patients surveyed as part of the Emergency Services Initiative had some type of coverage, primarily Medicare or Medicaid. ⋯ Changing staff behavior is often as challenging as changing patient behavior. Pre-project planning and communication about purpose, scope, and procedures are necessary if projects are to begin and continue smoothly. Ongoing evaluation is also key.
-
Ann R Coll Surg Engl · Jan 1994
Intravenous sedation in accident and emergency departments: a nationwide survey.
Anonymous questionnaires regarding the practice of intravenous sedation were sent to all accident and emergency departments in England and Wales. The response rate was 63%. Intravenous sedation was used by 94% of the departments who replied. ⋯ In 16% of the units no monitoring was used routinely. ECG monitoring was carried out by 48% of the departments, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring by 67% and pulse oximetry by 65%. Our findings indicate there is a need for guidelines regarding patient selection, the choice of drugs and the monitoring of patients.
-
Infection control for health care workers caring for critically injured patients: a national survey.
Prevention of transmission of bloodborne pathogens to health care workers (HCWs) involved in resuscitation of critically injured patients presents special challenges. As a step toward creation of a standard, a telephone survey of the infection control practices in this setting of the 100 busiest EDs in the United States (US) was performed. Departmental staff who were knowledgeable about ED infection prevention protocols were questioned about general policy, barrier protection measures, sharps management, and educational programs directed to HCWs. ⋯ Only 59 EDs (72%) reported that sharp containers were always within arm's reach of HCWs with material to discard. Specially adapted equipment included self-sheathing intravenous catheters (21, 26%) and needle/syringe combinations (16, 20%). Considerable variation exists in infection control practices in busy US EDs during resuscitation of critically injured patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)