Articles: pain.
-
J Cardiothorac Anesth · Apr 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialIntrapleural bupivacaine v saline after thoracotomy--effects on pain and lung function--a double-blind study.
The effects of intrapleural (IP) bupivacaine on pain, morphine requirement, and pulmonary function were evaluated in 15 patients for 24 hours after thoracotomy. An IP catheter was placed during surgery. Patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive 1.5 mg/kg of 0.5% bupivacaine IP or saline on two occasions, eight hours apart. ⋯ The analgesic effect was shortlived (two to five hours), possibly because of loss of bupivacaine in the chest drains. No differences were seen between the two groups after the effect of IP bupivacaine had worn off. Plasma bupivacaine levels had a Cmax of 0.44 to 1.50 micrograms/mL, with a Tmax at 5 to 30 minutes with levels well below 2 to 4 micrograms/mL where increasing toxicity is seen.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Control of severe pain with sustained-release morphine tablets v. oral morphine solution.
Recently a sustained-release morphine sulfate tablet (MS Contin [MSC]) was introduced in Canada. In a randomized double-blind crossover trial we compared MSC given every 12 hours with a morphine sulfate solution (MSS) given every 4 hours to 17 patients suffering from chronic severe pain. After titration of the morphine dosage to optimize the analgesic effect, each patient received 10 days of therapy with either MSC or MSS, then 10 days of therapy with an equal daily dose of the other formulation. ⋯ The study had an 89% probability of detecting a clinically significant difference in VAS pain scores. We conclude that an individualized, twice-daily regimen of MSC is as effective as MSS given every 4 hours for control of severe pain. The twice-daily regimen has several advantages: it provides for an uninterrupted night's sleep, it is substantially more convenient than the six doses per day required with MSS, and it should help reduce both medication errors and noncompliance.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Caudal epidural morphine for control of pain following open heart surgery in children.
The safety and efficacy of epidural morphine injected into the caudal space for control of postoperative pain following open cardiac surgery in children was studied. Thirty-two children between the ages of 2-12 yr for whom early postoperative tracheal extubation was anticipated were randomly assigned to control and study groups. Study subjects received a caudal injection of preservative free morphine sulfate (0.075 mg/kg) in preservative-free normal saline (5-10 ml) following completion of surgery, but prior to awakening and extubation of the trachea. ⋯ No patient described pruritus. The authors were unable to evaluate the occurrence of urinary retention because all patients had indwelling urinary catheters. They found caudal epidural morphine to be safe and effective in the treatment of postoperative pain in children following open heart surgery.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Epidural steroids, epidural morphine and epidural steroids combined with morphine in the treatment of post-laminectomy syndrome.
Epidural morphine injection followed by a steroid has been reported to be effective for the post-laminectomy pain ('failed back') syndrome. This double-blind, parallel study was undertaken to evaluate that mode of therapy. Twenty-two patients who had undergone at least one prior laminectomy, who were still symptomatic, were randomized to receive 50 mg of lidocaine epidurally with: (a) 75 mg triamcinolone diacetate (TR); or (b) 8 mg of preservative-free morphine (MP); or (c) both (TR and MP), at 1 month intervals for 3 consecutive months. ⋯ No patient given morphine had pain relief for more than 1 month. Life-threatening ventilatory depression occurred in the group given triamcinolone and morphine. The use of morphine alone or combined with slow release triamcinolone does not appear to be appropriate for the treatment of the post-laminectomy pain syndrome.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Low-dose intrathecal diamorphine analgesia following major orthopaedic surgery.
In a randomized double-blind study we examined the effect of adding diamorphine 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg to intrathecal bupivacaine anaesthesia for major orthopaedic surgery. Duration of postoperative analgesia was considerably greater in patients given either doses of intrathecal diamorphine than in a control group of patients given bupivacaine alone (P less than 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two diamorphine doses (0.25 mg and 0.5 mg), each providing prolonged analgesia (10.8 and 9.9 h, respectively). Although there was no evidence of late respiratory depression, the frequency of adverse effects, in particular urinary retention, nausea and vomiting, was high in both groups receiving intrathecal diamorphine.