Articles: pain.
-
Br J Clin Pharmacol · Jan 1986
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialExperimental pain induced by electrical and thermal stimulation of the skin in healthy man: sensitivity to 75 and 150 mg diclofenac sodium in comparison with 60 mg codeine and placebo.
Models with experimentally induced pain in healthy man might be useful for the screening for analgesic effects of new drugs. Experimental pain models have been shown to discriminate reliably between the effects of opioid analgesics and placebo but their sensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents is disputed. This study investigated whether it would be possible by using electrically and thermally induced cutaneous pain to discriminate reliably the effects of single oral doses of 75 and 150 mg diclofenac sodium on the one hand and 60 mg codeine on the other from those of placebo. ⋯ Neither 150 mg nor 75 mg diclofenac caused more side effects than placebo, whereas codeine 60 mg elicited a high frequency of side effects. No severe adverse effects occurred after any one treatment. The results suggest that both electrically and thermally induced cutaneous pain are well suited to evaluate analgesic effects not only of opioids but also of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Cryoanalgesia for pain after herniorrhaphy.
The effect of freezing the ilioinguinal nerve on postoperative pain relief was examined in a double blind study in 36 patients undergoing herniorrhaphy, randomly allocated into two groups. Patients in the experimental group had their ilioinguinal nerves frozen during surgery and were compared with the patients in the control group who did not have cryoanalgesia. Pain relief was assessed over a 48-hour period in three ways, namely the linear analogue pain scale, peak expiratory flow rates and the amount of analgesic drugs required by patients in the two groups. We conclude that cryoanalgesia of the ilioinguinal nerve alone does not produce significant early post herniorrhaphy pain relief.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Patient-controlled postoperative analgesia with alfentanil. Adaptive, on-demand intravenous alfentanil or pethidine compared double-blind for postoperative pain.
A double-blind study comparing alfentanil and pethidine given intravenously by an adaptive, patient-controlled on-demand analgesic system is described. It was demonstrated that, despite its well-known rapid onset of effect, alfentanil took several hours to achieve good quality analgesia. ⋯ Alfentanil was associated with significantly less sedation during the postoperative period than pethidine, and was also associated with a significantly greater urine output during the 24-hour period of study. There was no evidence of tolerance or accumulation with either of the two drugs.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1985
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA double-blind comparison of multiple intramuscular doses of ciramadol, morphine, and placebo for the treatment of postoperative pain.
Ciramadol, an agonist-antagonist analgesic (in intramuscular doses of 30 and 60 mg) was compared with 10 mg of morphine and placebo in a double-blind, parallel study in 160 patients with postoperative pain. The patients were assigned randomly to one of the four treatment groups and could receive a dose of the medication every 3 hr as needed for 48 hr; a maximum of six doses was allowed in a 24-hr period. Formal efficacy assessments using standard pain intensity and pain relief scales were restricted to the initial dose period. ⋯ Sedation was slightly higher with the active therapies than with placebo. Changes in vital signs were minimal. It is concluded that 60 mg of ciramadol compares favorably with 10 mg of morphine as a postoperative analgesic.
-
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol · Nov 1985
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPostextraction pain relief in children: a clinical trial of liquid analgesics.
Our objective was to evaluate the relative efficacies of four liquid analgesics in children, five to twelve years of age, following dental extractions. The analgesics, acetaminophen elixir (240 or 360 mg), acetaminophen with codeine elixir (240 mg and 24 mg, respectively), aluminum ibuprofen suspension (200 mg), and placebo liquid were administered at home, as a single dose, in a randomized double-blind study design. Of the 154 patients enrolled, 45 were evaluated, 39 patients never required medication, 12 were lost to follow-up, and 8 were excluded for other reasons. ⋯ The global rating of drug efficacy was statistically superior for aluminum ibuprofen. The majority of patients in all four groups were pain-free after four hours. No adverse reactions were reported during the study.