Articles: pain.
-
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
On the sensitivity of the tourniquet pain test.
Twenty-four chronic pain patients were given, on each of 4 successive days, oral doses of 60 mg morphine, 60 mg codeine, 600 mg aspirin and placebo, using a double-blind counterbalanced design. Two hours after ingestion, subjective pain estimates and tourniquet pain scores were obtained. ⋯ However, differences in pain estimates were also too small to discriminate among the drugs, and the lack of sensitivity may be a function of pain chronicity. The tourniquet techniques will continue to be useful until there is a purely objective measure of the severity of clinical pain.
-
The neural mechanism of the modulating effects of spinal cord stimulation upon intractable pain was studied in cats under local anaesthesia. The electrical activity at the centre median nucleus of the thalamus (CEM), which responded to noxious stimuli and was inhibited by nitrous oxide inhalation, was recorded as an indicator of the degree of pain sensation. The suppressed effect upon the evoked potential responding to sciatic stimulation (1 Hz) was recorded during and after train stimulation of various parts of the spinal cord by means of silver ball bipolar electrode. ⋯ This effect corresponds to the inhibitory effect by 75% N2O gas inhalation. Upon dorsal column stimulation, the intraspinal electrical activity is found in the central gray matter the antero-lateral quandrants of the spinal cord as well as the dorsal column. 2) Following lateral or anterior column stimulation as well as dorsal column stimulation, the CEM evoked potential responding to sciatic stimulation is inhibited by about 50% of its amplitude. 3) Following bilateral dorsal tractotomy cranial, caudal or both to the stimulating point, the CEM evoked potentials responding to sciatic stimulation are inhibited by dorsal column stimulation. According to the experimental results, it may be concluded that the inhibitory modulating mechanism by dorsal column stimulation for pain relief is not only mediated through the dorsal column, but also through other ascending spinal pathways.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Double-blind evaluation of buprenorphine hydrochloride for post-operative pain.
In a double-blind, random assignment study of four groups of 40 patients, relief of severe pain with buprenorphine hydrochloride 0.2 mg or 0.4 mg was evaluated and compared with morphine sulphate 5 or 10 mg. Evaluations included pain intensity, pain relief, sedation and other effects for up to 12 hours after drug administration, following recovery of wakefulness from anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery. Analyses of five parameters showed that the four groups were statistically comparable and that buprenorphine hydrochloride is at least 50 times more potent than morphine sulphate and has a substantially longer duration of analgesic action. Further clinical evaluation is, therefore, recommended.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Postoperative analgesia with ketamine and pethidine.
A double-blind trial compared ketamine with pethidine, pethidine alone at two dose levels and a placebo, in patients with postoperative pain. By assessment of pain intensity, observed relief and side-effects, the active drugs were clearly distinguishable from the placebo. With the doses used, however, the combination of ketamine with pethidine showed no advantage over pethidine alone.