Articles: anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Timing of caudal block placement in relation to surgery does not affect duration of postoperative analgesia in paediatric ambulatory patients.
The purpose of this study was to determine if the timing of caudal block placement in relation to surgery affected either the duration of postoperative pain relief or the discharge time in children undergoing brief ambulatory surgical procedures. Forty ASA physical status I or II children ages 18 mo to 11 yr were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group 1 patients received a caudal block with 0.5 ml.kg-1 of bupivacaine 0.25 per cent following the induction of anaesthesia but before the onset of surgery. ⋯ Pain was assessed at five-minute intervals using an Objective Pain Scale. No statistically significant differences were noted between Group 1 and Group 2 patients with regard to their postoperative pain/discomfort scores, the need for postoperative narcotic analgesia, or the time required for either group to meet standard discharge criteria. It is concluded that the duration of postoperative analgesia is not impaired by placing the caudal block prior to the start of a brief surgical procedure.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Local anesthesia in pediatric patients: topical TAC versus lidocaine.
Lacerations requiring sutures are a common surgical emergency in children. Traditional anesthesia prior to suturing has been intradermal lidocaine. TAC (0.5% tetracaine, 1:2,000 adrenalin, 11.8% cocaine) is a topically applied anesthetic. ⋯ TAC was significantly better (P less than .002) with regard to patient compliance with the suturing process than lidocaine or placebo. Seventeen percent of patients who received placebo had initial anesthesia. These results suggest that TAC, when applied correctly, may be the preferred anesthetic for laceration repair in children.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Emergence respiratory complications in children: a comparison between halothane and isoflurane.
-
Obstetrics and gynecology · May 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialAnesthesia for neonatal circumcision: local anesthesia is better than dorsal penile nerve block.
Several studies document the benefit of dorsal penile nerve block for neonatal circumcision, but the literature does not address the use of local anesthesia. A randomized, controlled, prospective study was conducted to compare the efficacy of dorsal penile nerve block versus local anesthesia. Thirty infants were randomly divided into three equal groups (N = 10): an unanesthetized control group, a group given dorsal penile nerve block, and a group given local anesthesia. ⋯ Dorsal penile nerve block had no effect on postoperative cortisol levels. No complications occurred. Although both types of anesthesia attenuated the physiologic responses to circumcision, local anesthesia demonstrated greater efficacy than dorsal penile nerve block while being simpler to perform.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · May 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of the effects of fentanyl on respiratory mechanics under propofol or thiopental anaesthesia.
Twenty patients were randomly anaesthetized with either thiopental 5 mg/kg followed by a 15 mg/kg/h continuous infusion, or propofol 2.5 mg/kg followed by a 9 mg/kg/h continuous infusion, paralysed with vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg, intubated and ventilated with nitrous oxide 50% in oxygen. Fifteen minutes after induction, fentanyl 5 micrograms/kg was injected. Inspiratory tracheal pressure (PT), gas flow (V) and volume (V) were continuously measured while the lungs were inflated with a constant inspiratory flow ventilator. ⋯ In both groups Crs decreased following anaesthesia. Fentanyl injection elicited an increase in Rrs (from 1.04 +/- 0.70 to 1.63 +/- 0.92 kPa x l-1 x s) and a further decrease in Crs (from 0.55 +/- 0.30 to 0.42 +/- 0.10 l x kPa-1) in the thiopental group but not in the propofol group (Rrs: 1.26 +/- 0.69 to 1.08 +/- 0.44 kPa x l-1 x s, Crs: 0.49 +/- 0.11 to 0.48 +/- 0.13 l x kPa-1). These results suggest that the dose of propofol administered in this study may prevent fentanyl-induced bronchoconstriction.