Articles: anesthesia.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · May 1988
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialFentanyl pretreatment modifies anaesthetic induction with etomidate.
Haemodynamic changes and side-effects of induction of anaesthesia with etomidate were evaluated in 60 ASA Class I or II patients. The objective was to find an optimal pre-induction dose of fentanyl which eliminated haemodynamic changes and side-effects during induction and intubation without introducing other problems. Patients were randomly assigned to four groups according to the pretreatment dose of fentanyl (Group I = 2 ml normal saline; Group II = 100 micrograms of fentanyl; Group III = 250 micrograms of fentanyl; Group IV = 500 micrograms of fentanyl) administered intravenously five minutes prior to induction of anaesthesia with etomidate, 0.3 mg/kg. ⋯ There were also significant linear regression relationships (P less than 0.01 ANOVA for linear regression) between increasing doses of fentanyl administered before etomidate and the prevention of increases in systolic blood pressure and heart rate during the induction-intubation sequence. The data demonstrate that increasing pre-induction doses of fentanyl are more effective at minimising side-effects and preventing increases in systolic arterial blood pressure and heart rate but also increase the incidence of apnoea during induction. The results suggest that 500 micrograms of fentanyl is an ideal pretreatment dose in fit patients prior to anaesthetic induction with etomidate.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Nausea and vomiting after general anaesthesia with isoflurane, enflurane or fentanyl in combination with nitrous oxide and oxygen.
One-hundred and eighty patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy were anaesthetized in random order with isoflurane, enflurane or fentanyl in combination with nitrous oxide and oxygen. Incidence and severity of emetic sequelae (none, nausea, retching or vomiting) were studied during the first 24 h after the operation. ⋯ There was no difference between the groups in the overall incidence of emetic sequelae during the time period of 2-24 h post-operatively (isoflurane 65%, enflurane 77% and fentanyl 77%). Significantly (P less than 0.02) more patients had emetic sequelae if they had experienced nausea or had vomited after previous anaesthetics.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparative study of continuous and intermittent epidural analgesia for labour and delivery.
This study compares a continuous infusion technique with intermittent "top-up" doses using 0.25 per cent bupivacaine for epidural analgesia for labour and delivery in healthy primiparous patients. Sixty women were randomized into two groups, A (continuous) and B (intermittent). Twenty-eight patients in Group A and 29 in Group B completed the study. ⋯ More women in Group A required outlet forceps (p less than 0.05) whereas mid-forceps and Caesarean section rates were similar in the two groups. Fewer mothers in the infusion group had spontaneous vaginal delivery. We conclude that infusion techniques are as effective as intermittent top-up epidurals and are well received by mothers in labour.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour.
In a randomised, single-blinded, placebo-controlled study, 27 parturients in labour receiving epidural 0.125 per cent bupivacaine, were assessed to evaluate the efficacy of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) compared with continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA). Group A (n = 14) received a background infusion of 4 ml.hr-1 0.125 per cent bupivacaine, with further 4 ml aliquots, self-administered, as required (up to 16 ml.hr-1). Group B (n = 11) received a continuous infusion of 12 ml.hr-1 through the same PCA apparatus, but with the demand-button deactivated. ⋯ Pain relief was similar in both groups. Patients expressed overall satisfaction with PCEA, appreciating control over their own pain relief and less reliance on medical staff. PCEA is a safe, effective means of providing optimal analgesia during labour, with minimal local anaesthetic requirement.
-
Plast. Reconstr. Surg. · May 1988
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of midazolam and diazepam for sedation during plastic surgery.
A randomized double-blind study was designed to compare midazolam, a rapid-acting water-soluble benzodiazepine, with diazepam for sedation when administered as an adjuvant to ketamine during local anesthesia. In the preliminary dose-ranging study, midazolam (0.05 to 0.15 mg/kg IV) was found to produce a spectrum of central nervous system activity (e.g., sedation, amnesia) that was similar to diazepam (0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg IV). However, the slope of midazolam's dose-response curve for sedation appeared to be steeper (i.e., a narrower therapeutic dosage range). ⋯ Midazolam was associated with significantly less pain on injection and a lower incidence of postoperative venoirritation. Overall patient acceptance was higher with midazolam compared to diazepam. Finally, recovery characteristics were similar for the two benzodiazepines in our outpatient setting.