Articles: anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour.
In a randomised, single-blinded, placebo-controlled study, 27 parturients in labour receiving epidural 0.125 per cent bupivacaine, were assessed to evaluate the efficacy of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) compared with continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA). Group A (n = 14) received a background infusion of 4 ml.hr-1 0.125 per cent bupivacaine, with further 4 ml aliquots, self-administered, as required (up to 16 ml.hr-1). Group B (n = 11) received a continuous infusion of 12 ml.hr-1 through the same PCA apparatus, but with the demand-button deactivated. ⋯ Pain relief was similar in both groups. Patients expressed overall satisfaction with PCEA, appreciating control over their own pain relief and less reliance on medical staff. PCEA is a safe, effective means of providing optimal analgesia during labour, with minimal local anaesthetic requirement.
-
Plast. Reconstr. Surg. · May 1988
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of midazolam and diazepam for sedation during plastic surgery.
A randomized double-blind study was designed to compare midazolam, a rapid-acting water-soluble benzodiazepine, with diazepam for sedation when administered as an adjuvant to ketamine during local anesthesia. In the preliminary dose-ranging study, midazolam (0.05 to 0.15 mg/kg IV) was found to produce a spectrum of central nervous system activity (e.g., sedation, amnesia) that was similar to diazepam (0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg IV). However, the slope of midazolam's dose-response curve for sedation appeared to be steeper (i.e., a narrower therapeutic dosage range). ⋯ Midazolam was associated with significantly less pain on injection and a lower incidence of postoperative venoirritation. Overall patient acceptance was higher with midazolam compared to diazepam. Finally, recovery characteristics were similar for the two benzodiazepines in our outpatient setting.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Continuous infusion epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized, double-blind comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine.
The analgesic efficacy of the continuous epidural infusion of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl was compared with the infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine alone in a randomized, double-blind study of nulliparous women. Each patient received, in sequence: 1) 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine; 2) 6 ml of study solution 1 (bupivacaine-fentanyl group: 0.125% bupivacaine/0.0008% fentanyl; bupivacaine-only group: 0.25% bupivacaine alone); and 3) a continuous epidural infusion of study solution 2 at a rate of 12.5 ml/h (bupivacaine-fentanyl group: 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl; bupivacaine-only group: 0.125% bupivacaine alone). The epidural infusion was discontinued at full cervical dilatation, but patients who lacked perineal anesthesia received one or two 5-ml boluses of study solution 3 (bupivacaine-fentanyl group: 0.0625% bupivacaine alone; bupivacaine-only group: 0.125% bupivacaine alone). ⋯ During the second stage, 22 of 37 (59%) women in the bupivacaine-fentanyl group, and 23 of 35 (66%) women in the bupivacaine-only group, rated their analgesia as excellent or good (P = NS). Women in the bupivacaine-only group were more likely to have motor block at full cervical dilatation (P less than .001). There was no significant difference between groups in duration of the second stage of labor, duration of pushing, position of the vertex before delivery, method of delivery, Apgar scores, or umbilical cord blood gas and acid-base values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Anesthesia for ophthalmic surgery in the elderly: the effects of clonidine on intraocular pressure, perioperative hemodynamics, and anesthetic requirement.
The effects of clonidine on intraocular pressure and perioperative cardiovascular variables were studied by a randomized double blind design in 80 elderly patients (ASA physical status I-III) scheduled for elective ophthalmic surgery under general anesthesia (GA) and local anesthesia (LA). Group 1 (n = 40), the control group, received diazepam po (0.1 mg.kg-1) 90-120 min prior to arrival to the operating room. Group 2 (n = 40) received clonidine po approximately 5 micrograms.kg-1 po at the same time. ⋯ Intraoperatively, a significantly higher incidence of hypertension (P less than 0.01) and tachycardia (P less than 0.05) were respectively observed in the LA subset and GA subset of the controls when contrasted with the corresponding subset of those receiving clonidine. Moreover, clonidine was more effective than diazepam as a premedication; in fact, satisfactory intraoperative sedation and cardiovascular stability were observed in 85% of the patients who received clonidine, and in 50% of those patients who did not receive clonidine (P less than 0.01). Thus, clonidine may represent a useful adjunct in the management of the aged patient in the setting of ophthalmic surgery.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · May 1988
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEpidural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a comparison of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine both with adrenaline.
Thirty-eight women having caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia received either lignocaine 2% or bupivacaine 0.5% both with adrenaline 1:200,000 in a double-blind, randomised study. The time to establish satisfactory surgical anaesthesia, the volume required and the quality of analgesia as assessed by the anaesthetist, patient pain and discomfort scales and patient approval, were not significantly different. ⋯ Neonatal outcomes were uniformly good. Both local anaesthetics provided satisfactory epidural anaesthesia and neither proved to have a distinct advantage in the clinical setting of this study.