Articles: anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The oesophageal detector device. Assessment of a new method to distinguish oesophageal from tracheal intubation.
A new method to distinguish oesophageal from tracheal intubation using the oesophageal detector device was evaluated. In 100 healthy adults, observers of differing experience reliably and rapidly detected 51 oesophageal and 49 tracheal intubations in a randomised, single-blind trial. ⋯ This method can be used in patients with bronchospasm to detect correct tracheal placement when auscultation and decreased compliance of the chest may make clinical confirmation difficult. It can be concluded from this study that the oesophageal detector device is a reliable, rapid, inexpensive and easy to use method for the detection of oesophageal intubation and its very low cost should make it readily available in all situations where tracheal intubation is carried out.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1988
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Comparative repercussions of general and spinal anesthesia on the psychological functions of the aged subject].
Although worsening cerebral function in the elderly is often said to be due to anaesthesia, it still remains to be proved that anesthesia acts on an elderly patient's psychological make-up. This study aimed to compare the psychological effects of general or spinal anaesthesia on 35 patients more than 70-yr old under repair of a subcapital femoral fracture, after having excluded 63 patients. They were randomly divided into two groups, the first receiving a spinal anaesthetic with 1.5 mg.kg-1 prilocaine (RA; n = 19), and the others a general anaesthetic with 5 mg.kg-1 thiopentone, dextromoramide, nitrous oxide and enflurane (GA; n = 16). ⋯ Individual psychological scores did not differ either. In the RA group, the postoperative tests were even better carried out than before surgery (p less than 0.05). It could therefore be concluded that anaesthesia alone has little impact on the psychological status of elderly patients.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1988
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial[Prolongation of spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine by adrenaline and clonidine in the elderly].
So as to determine the effects of vasoconstriction on the duration of hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia, a prospective controlled study was carried out on 80 ASA class II or III patients, aged 75 years or more, who were scheduled for spinal anaesthesia for lower limb surgery. They were randomly allocated to four groups, and were each given 3 ml (15 mg) of 0.5% bupivacaine in plain solution with 0.5 ml of 30% dextrose solution, together with 1 ml normal saline in group I, 0.15 mg clonidine in group II, 0.2 mg adrenaline in group III, and 0.4 mg adrenaline in group IV. All patients therefore received 4.5 ml of 0.33% bupivacaine solution in 3.3% dextrose solution. ⋯ Regression times tended to increase more with 0.4 mg than with 0.2 mg adrenaline. Significant prolongation of motor block was also associated with the addition of vasoconstrictors. It is concluded that addition of 0.15 mg clonidine or 0.4 mg adrenaline may be useful to increase duration of hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia in elderly patients.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Intrathecal sufentanil as a supplement to subarachnoid anaesthesia with lignocaine.
The combination of low-dose sufentanil with lignocaine for subarachnoid anaesthesia was studied in a double-blind comparative trial in 40 urological patients. Patients were allocated randomly to two groups and received 5% heavy lignocaine 1.5 ml together with either 1.5 ml of sufentanil 5 micrograms ml-1, or physiological saline 1.5 ml. ⋯ There was no significant difference in the number of patients requiring supplementary analgesics. Side-effects were similar in both groups.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Extradural bupivacaine with sufentanil for vaginal delivery. A double-blind trial.
The combination of sufentanil with bupivacaine plus adrenaline given extradurally for pain relief during labour was studied in a double-blind trial. One hundred and twenty patients were randomly divided into three groups and received a 10-ml extradural injection of sufentanil 15 micrograms + bupivacaine 12.5 mg + adrenaline 12.5 micrograms, sufentanil 7.5 micrograms + bupivacaine 12.5 mg + adrenaline 12.5 micrograms, or bupivacaine 12.5 mg + adrenaline 12.5 micrograms (control group). A second injection, which was given upon request, was identical to the first. ⋯ Moreover, the quality of analgesia was better and less bupivacaine was required, resulting in less motor blockade at delivery. There were no differences between the three groups in regard to Apgar scores. The only side effect of sufentanil was pruritus.