Articles: critical-illness.
-
Children account for 30% of visits to emergency departments, and approximately 5% of these children have serious illness requiring immediate intervention. Over the past decades, as medical knowledge and application have eradicated many illness and rendered others curable, trauma has emerged as the leading cause of morbidity and mortality after the first year of life. However, all children remain vulnerable to infection and its consequences in the first year and beyond the first year. ⋯ The ability to accomplish this requires a knowledge of the common culprits resulting in serious illness, an understanding of how they manifest in the physical examination, and an array of technical skills utilizing appropriate specially sized equipment. Furthermore, an understanding of child development and the ability to interpret the physical examination of the children of different ages is essential. This article will attempt to simplify this seemingly overwhelming task by considering a common thread in all critical illness.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Dec 1995
Comparative StudyChanges in vancomycin pharmacokinetics in critically ill infants.
We aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in critically ill infants, and to evaluate the standard recommended dose of 10 mg/kg 6 hourly. All infants admitted to the Baragwanath Hospital ICU who had arterial lines in situ, and for whom vancomycin 10 mg/kg 6 hourly was prescribed for an infective insult and who had parental consent, were included in the study. Vancomycin was infused over 60 minutes. ⋯ Critically ill infants displayed a large initial volume of distribution which probably resulted from aggressive fluid resuscitation. This also results in a large variation in other pharmacokinetic parameters, namely Cmax and t1/2el. Although the routine monitoring of vancomycin serum concentrations remain controversial, we feel that in view of these large pharmacokinetic variations, the critically ill infant is a specific group where monitoring of vancomycin serum levels is indicated.
-
All patients discharged from a general intensive care unit over a 4.5 year period were sent a questionnaire 3 months after discharge which investigated aspects of their health and physical abilities. Replies were compared on the basis of age, diagnosis and sickness severity on admission. Five hundred and four questionnaires were analysed. ⋯ Patients aged 76 years or older were more likely to perceive their health as 'better than average' than younger patients (p < 0.01). Eight percent of patients would be unwilling to undergo intensive care again. An unacceptable health status after intensive care cannot be predicted in any group of patients.
-
One hundred and eighty patients had serum thyrotropin, total triiodothyronine and free thyroxine concentrations measured within 3 h of admission to the Intensive Therapy Unit to assess whether thyroid function tests could predict outcome in critical illness. Overall mortality was 30.6%. Nonsurvivors were older (p = 0.001), and had higher APACHE II scores (p < 0.001) and predicted mortalities (p < 0.001). ⋯ No variable independently predicted death. Total triiodothyronine concentrations were lower in patients who received dopamine before admission to the intensive therapy unit than those who did not (p = 0.008); thyrotropin and free thyroxine concentrations were not influenced by dopamine administration. Serum concentrations of thyrotropin, total triiodothyronine and free thyroxine measured within 3 h of admission to the intensive therapy unit are not predictive of outcome.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.
To improve end-of-life decision making and reduce the frequency of a mechanically supported, painful, and prolonged process of dying. ⋯ The phase I observation of SUPPORT confirmed substantial shortcomings in care for seriously ill hospitalized adults. The phase II intervention failed to improve care or patient outcomes. Enhancing opportunities for more patient-physician communication, although advocated as the major method for improving patient outcomes, may be inadequate to change established practices. To improve the experience of seriously ill and dying patients, greater individual and societal commitment and more proactive and forceful measured may be needed.