Articles: anesthetics.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Isoproterenol is an effective marker of intravenous injection in laboring women.
The purpose of this randomized, double-blind study was to determine if isoproterenol 5 micrograms iv produces a consistent, noticeable tachycardia in healthy, laboring women. Maternal heart rate, fetal heart rate, and uterine contractions were continuously recorded and maternal blood pressure was measured every minute for 10 min before and after each patient received either normal saline (NS group; n = 10) or isoproterenol 5 micrograms (ISO group; n = 10) iv. The data-collecting investigator and a nurse palpating the patient's radial artery determined which solution they thought had been administered. ⋯ Diastolic and mean blood pressures did not change. No fetal distress occurred. Isoproterenol 5 micrograms is an effective marker of intravascular injection in laboring women; however, the safety and efficacy of epidural isoproterenol must be demonstrated in animals before isoproterenol can be incorporated in an epidural anesthesia test dose.
-
J Cardiothorac Anesth · Aug 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSufentanil is preferable to etomidate during rapid-sequence anesthesia induction for aortocoronary bypass surgery.
To evaluate rapid-sequence anesthetic induction techniques for aortocoronary bypass grafting, 20 patients scheduled for elective surgery were randomly assigned to receive bolus injections of either etomidate, 0.4 mg/kg, intravenously (IV), or sufentanil, 5 micrograms/kg, IV, with succinylcholine, 1 mg/kg, IV. Patients in the two groups had similar demographic characteristics and baseline (preinduction) hemodynamic values. ⋯ No sufentanil patient demonstrated either ischemia or infarction. It is concluded that sufentanil-succinylcholine provides more stable hemodynamics and fewer ischemic myocardial events than etomidate-succinylcholine in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1989
Solubility of I-653, sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane in plastics and rubber composing a conventional anesthetic circuit.
This study defines some characteristics of a standard anesthetic circuit that may impede anesthetic induction and recovery with I-653, sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane. Partition coefficients for anesthetic circuit components (masks, bellows, bags, airways, and circuit tubes) consistently ranked halothane greater than isoflurane greater than sevoflurane greater than I-653, suggesting a reverse order of washin and washout rates for an anesthetic circuit constructed from similar components. ⋯ The rates of change in I-653 concentration closely approximated the maximal possible theoretical rates. Our results suggest that absorption of I-653 by circuit components or soda lime should not hinder induction of or recovery from anesthesia.