Articles: anesthetics.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialA randomized multicenter study of remifentanil compared with halothane in neonates and infants undergoing pyloromyotomy. I. Emergence and recovery profiles.
Pyloric stenosis is sometimes associated with hemodynamic instability and postoperative apnea. In this multicenter study we examined the hemodynamic response and recovery profile of remifentanil and compared it with that of halothane in infants undergoing pyloromyotomy. After atropine, propofol, and succinylcholine administration and tracheal intubation, patients were randomized (2:1 ratio) to receive either remifentanil with nitrous oxide and oxygen or halothane with nitrous oxide and oxygen as the maintenance anesthetic. Pre- and postoperative pneumograms were done and evaluated by an observer blinded to the study. Intraoperative hemodynamic data and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge times, PACU recovery scores, pain medications, and adverse events (vomiting, bradycardia, dysrhythmia, and hypoxemia) were recorded by the study's research nurse. There were no significant differences in patient age or weight between the two groups. There were no significant differences in hemodynamic values between the two groups at the various intraoperative stress points. The extubation times, PACU discharge times, pain medications, and adverse events were similar for both groups. No patient anesthetized with remifentanil who had a normal preoperative pneumogram had an abnormal postoperative pneumogram, whereas three patients with a normal preoperative pneumogram who were anesthetized with halothane had abnormal pneumograms after. ⋯ The use of ultra-short-acting opioids may be an appropriate technique for infants less than 2 mo old when tracheal extubation after surgery is anticipated.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialA randomized multicenter study of remifentanil compared with halothane in neonates and infants undergoing pyloromyotomy. II. Perioperative breathing patterns in neonates and infants with pyloric stenosis.
Although former preterm birth infants are at risk for postoperative apnea after surgery, it is unclear whether the same is true of full-term birth infants. We evaluated the incidence of apnea in 60 full-term neonates and infants undergoing pyloromyotomy both before and after anesthesia. All subjects were randomized to a remifentanil- or halothane-based anesthetic. Apnea was defined by the presence of prolonged apnea (>15 s) or frequent brief apnea, as observed on the pneumocardiogram. Apnea occurred before surgery in 27% of subjects and after surgery in 16% of subjects, with no significant difference between subjects randomized to remifentanil or halothane anesthesia. This apnea was primarily central in origin, occurred throughout the recording epochs, and was associated with severe desaturation in some instances. Of the subjects with normal preoperative pneumocardiograms, new onset postoperative apnea occurred in 3 (23%) of 13 subjects who received halothane-based anesthetics versus 0 (0%) of 22 subjects who received remifentanil-based anesthetics (P = 0.04). Thus, postoperative apnea can follow anesthesia in otherwise healthy full-term infants after pyloromyotomy and is occasionally severe with desaturation. New-onset postoperative apnea was not seen with a remifentanil-based anesthetic. ⋯ Abnormal breathing patterns can follow anesthesia in infants after surgical repair of pyloric stenosis. Occasionally, these patterns can be associated with desaturation. New-onset postoperative apnea was not seen with a remifentanil-based anesthetic.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the EMLA patch for the reduction of pain associated with intramuscular injection in four to six-year-old children.
The effectiveness of a eutectic mixture lidocaine-prilocaine topical anaesthetic cream (EMLA) patch compared with a placebo patch in the reduction of pain associated with intramuscular immunization was evaluated. As part of the study, 161 children (aged 4-6-y) undergoing routine diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus and polio (DPTP) immunization in five urban and five rural private office settings were randomly assigned to an EMLA patch (n = 83) or a placebo patch control group (n = 78). Pain measurements included: child's self-report on a Faces Pain Scale; facial action on the Child Facial Coding System; the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale and parent and technician ratings on a Visual Analogue Scale. Parents also rated their own and their child's immunization-related anxiety on a Visual Analogue Scale. The EMLA patch group had significantly less pain on all four pain measures compared with the placebo group. Of the children in the placebo group, 43% had clinically significant pain, compared with 17% of children in the EMLA patch group. No severe adverse symptoms occurred as a result of either EMLA or placebo patch application. ⋯ The EMLA patch reduced immunization pain in 4 to 6-y-old children during needle injection.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Nov 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialPlasma concentrations of ropivacaine following a single-shot caudal block of 1, 2 or 3 mg/kg in children.
For documenting the properties of ropivacaine used for regional anaesthesia in children, the relationship between dose and resulting systemic exposure is essential. The aim of this pharmacokinetic part of a randomised, multicentre, double-blind study was to determine the free and total plasma levels of ropivacaine in children aged between 4 and 12 years following a single-shot caudal dose of 1, 2 or 3 mg/kg of ropivacaine for postoperative pain management. ⋯ Following single-shot caudal doses of 1-3 mg/kg in children up to 25 kg and aged between 4 and 12 years, plasma levels of free ropivacaine increase in proportion to dose and all were shown to be within safe limits.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparative efficacy and safety of remifentanil and fentanyl in 'fast track' coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized, double-blind study.
This multi-centre, parallel group, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of high-dose remifentanil administered by continuous infusion with an intermittent bolus fentanyl regimen, when given in combination with propofol for general anaesthesia in 321 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A significantly lower proportion of the patients who received remifentanil had responses to maximal sternal spread (the primary efficacy endpoint) compared with those who received fentanyl (11% vs 52%; P<0.001). More patients who received remifentanil responded to tracheal intubation compared with those who received fentanyl (24% vs 9%; P<0.001). ⋯ Overall, the incidence of adverse events was similar but greater in the remifentanil group with respect to shivering (P<0.049) and hypertension (P<0.001). Significantly more drug-related adverse events were reported in the remifentanil group (P=0.016). There were no drug-related adverse cardiac outcomes and no deaths from cardiac causes before hospital discharge in either treatment group.