Articles: nausea.
-
In an editorial, Kapur [4] described perioperative nausea and vomiting as the big "little problem following ambulatory surgery." In contrast to the attitudes of some physicians, patients put a high value on freedom from nausea and emesis in the postoperative period and are willing to accept some pain and drowsiness as the cost of controlling PONV [85]. Until recently, there had been little change in the incidence of postoperative emesis since the introduction of halothane into clinical practice in 1956. However, the introduction of the IV anesthetic agent propofol and of the NSAID ketorolac, plus abandonment of the policy of insisting that patients drink before discharge, appear to have contributed to a recent decline in the incidence of emesis. ⋯ Further research into the mechanisms of this common postoperative complication may help in improving the management of emetic sequelae in the future. Improvements in antiemetic therapy could have a major impact for surgical patients, particularly those undergoing ambulatory surgery. Just as pain is no longer considered an unavoidable part of the postoperative experience, so should nausea and vomiting be considered an avoidable side effect.
-
Comparative Study
Assessment of chemotherapy-induced emesis and evaluation of a reduced-dose intravenous ondansetron regimen in pediatric outpatients with leukemia.
To measure the severity of nausea and vomiting in pediatric patients receiving intravenous or intrathecal chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 intravenous doses of ondansetron for this condition. ⋯ Etoposide/cytarabine proved to be the most emetogenic of the chemotherapy treatments studied. A reduced-dose regimen of intravenous ondansetron was shown to be an effective antiemetic for the outpatient treatments with etoposide/cytarabine and carmustine, but not with cyclophosphamide.
-
Am. J. Clin. Oncol. · Dec 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialOndansetron and dexamethasone versus standard combination antiemetic therapy. A randomized trial for the prevention of acute and delayed emesis induced by cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin chemotherapy and maintenance of antiemetic effect at subsequent courses.
The antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron and dexamethasone (Ondex) was randomly compared to that of high-dose metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and orphenadrine (Control) in the prevention of emesis induced by cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin chemotherapy in 64 chemotherapy-naive breast cancer patients. For the control of acute emesis (day 1), patients were randomized to receive either ondasetron 8 mg p.o. 1 hour prior to chemotherapy (CT) and repeated after 6 and 12 hours plus dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. 40 minutes prior to CT (Ondex) or dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. 40 minutes prior to CT, orphenadrine 40 mg i.m. 35 minutes prior to CT and metoclopramide 3 mg/kg i.v. 30 minutes prior to CT and repeated after 90 minutes followed by 40 mg p.o. every 3 hours for 4 times (Control). To control delayed emesis, patients on Ondex received ondansetron 8 mg PO t.i.d. days 2 and 3 and patients in the Control arm received metoclopramide 0.5 mg/kg p.o. q.i.d. and dexamethasone 8 mg i.m. b.i.d. days 2 and 3. ⋯ Acute nausea was absent in 38% and 34% of patients treated with Ondex and Control, respectively (p = NS). Complete and major control of delayed emesis (days 2-5) was observed in 65%/91% versus 44%/66% of patients in the Ondex and Control arms, respectively (p = NS/p < .01). In patients receiving 6 courses of FEC/FAC, control of acute emesis was significantly superior with Ondex at all treatment courses.
-
In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 112 patients scheduled for knee-joint arthrotomies or minor orthopaedic operations received 75 mg diclofenac, 600 mg apazone, the combination of 75 mg diclofenac and 600 mg apazone, or placebo (50 ml NaCl 0.9%) as a single i.v. dose immediately after operation. Postoperative pain intensity was measured by a numeric rating scale. All patients were allowed to self-administer piritramide from a PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) pump (Prominjekt, Pharmacia, Sweden) in 2-mg boluses every 5 min during the first 6 h and subsequently every 15 minfor another 18 h after surgery. ⋯ The incidence of typical side effects of opioids and antipyretic anti-inflammatory analgesics (nausea, vomiting, stomach ache, headache, vertigo) was low, and they were easily controlled in all cases. Postoperative combined application of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics diclofenac and apazone results in a significantly lower opioid requirement (about 60%) after minor orthopaedic surgery. The opioid-sparing effect appears to be superior to that of diclofenac (44%) or apazone (42%) alone, but this was not statistically significant.
-
Analgesic pharmacotherapy represents one of the major approaches to the treatment of cancer pain, since it is used in almost every patient. A thorough evaluation of the physical and mental status of the patient and of the pain is as necessary as a sound understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the analgesics selected. The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued a basic 3 stage progression for the treatment of cancer pain, the "WHO Analgesic Ladder". ⋯ The most common of these is constipation; nausea, vomiting and sedation occur mostly at the start and can usually be treated effectively. The appropriate dosage, route of administration and dosage scheme of analgesics needs to be worked out for each individual patient in intensive work with the patient and a close follow-up, for years if necessary. Some analgesics may not be available in some countries, or only in specific preparations.