Articles: brain-injuries.
-
The value of routine skull radiography as a method of predicting intracranial injury is controversial. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of skull radiography by prospectively studying head-injured children admitted to a children's hospital that serves an urban population. ⋯ In children, severe intracranial injury can occur in the absence of skull fracture. Skull radiography is not a reliable predictor of intracranial injury and is indicated only to confirm or exclude a suspected depressed fracture or penetrating injury, and when non-accidental injury is suspected, including in all infants younger than 2 years. Clinical neurological abnormalities are a reliable predictor of intracranial injury. If imaging is required, it should be with CT and not skull radiography.
-
Among the pathological processes initiated by traumatic brain injury are excessive neuroexcitation and target cell deafferentation. The current study examines the contribution of these injury components, separately as well as their combined effect, on postinjury alterations in the capacity for long-term potentiation and the immunolocalization of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and GABA. Adult rats underwent central fluid percussion traumatic brain injury, electrolytic bilateral entorhinal cortex lesions, or a combined injury of both procedures separated by 24 h. ⋯ Both N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor and GABA immunobinding following combined injuries were also reduced relative to those observed following entorhinal lesions alone. The present results suggest that a process of receptor plasticity, possibly involving reactive synaptogenesis, may contribute to postdeafferentation enhancements of long-term potentiation, and that a traumatic brain insult will attenuate these enhancements. This interaction of different injury components suggests that recovery of function following brain injury may be enhanced by pharmacological reduction of neuroexcitation during postinjury intervals of reactive receptor plasticity.
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Mar 1997
Comparative StudyCerebral autoregulation following minor head injury.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with minor head injury experience impairments in cerebral autoregulation. Twenty-nine patients with minor head injuries defined by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 13 to 15 underwent testing of dynamic cerebral autoregulation within 48 hours of their injury using continuous transcranial Doppler velocity recordings and blood pressure recordings. Twenty-nine age-matched normal volunteers underwent autoregulation testing in the same manner to establish comparison values. ⋯ A significant correlation between lower blood pressure and worse autoregulation was found by regression analysis in head-injured patients (r = 0.6, p < 0.001); however, lower blood pressure did not account for the autoregulatory impairment in all patients. Within this group of head-injured patients there was no correlation between ARI and initial GCS or 1-month Glasgow Outcome Scale scores. This study indicates that a significant number of patients with minor head injury may have impaired cerebral autoregulation and may be at increased risk for secondary ischemic neuronal damage.
-
Multicenter Study
Magnetic resonance imaging: utilization in the management of central nervous system trauma.
To determine the availability, use, and perceived value of magnetic resonance imaging (MR) in the management of acute central nervous system (CNS) trauma in United States Level I (or equivalent) trauma centers (TCs). ⋯ Most trauma directors consider MR important in the acute evaluation of spinal trauma and, to a lesser extent, for traumatic brain injury. Despite these opinions, the vast majority of these centers reported only "rare" to "occasional" use of MR in the setting of acute CNS trauma. Our results show that most TCs have on-site and continuously available MR facilities capable of cardiac and pulmonary monitoring. Other factors such as the higher relative cost of MR may be responsible for the discrepancy between the perceived value and the actual utilization of MR imaging in the setting of CNS trauma.