Knowledge
-
From the best-available current evidence (Ahlqvist 2024): NO
The American Academy of Obstetrics and Gynecology's journal ACOG, summarises it best in Damkier et al.'s 2025 review article:
"According to the current scientific evidence, in utero exposure to acetaminophen is unlikely to confer a clinically important increased risk of childhood ADHD or ASD." - Damkier (2025)
Ahlqvist et al's 2024 Swedish cohort study of 2.48 million children showed that when controlling for family confounders by using sibiling controls, there was no association between paracetamol/acetaminophen use and various neurodevelopmental problems:
"Acetaminophen use during pregnancy was not associated with children's risk of autism, ADHD, or intellectual disability in sibling control analysis." - Ahlqvist (2024)
The problem with many of the earlier (and often contradictory) studies that showed a possible association, was that by necessity these were observational studies that struggled to control for confounders. The classic "association is not causation" trap. Ahlqvist et al's very large study, while still observational, uses matched sibling controls to neutralise "unobserved confounding" – and reassuringly, the association dissapears.
Nonetheless, it’s worthwhile being aware of the body of evidence and how it has evolved over the last decade. Professional obstetric organisation advice remains unchanged: paracetamol is appropriate to use in pregnancy when managing fever and pain, which untreated have their own detrimental fetal effects.
summary
-
Although there is some evidence of different efficacy among commonly used vasopressors, translating this to clinically-significant outcome differences is still uncertain.
Singh's 2020 Bayesian network meta-analysis is the most comprehensive study to date investigating this issue. The researchers concluded that norepinephrine, metaraminol, and mephentermine showed the lowest probability of adverse neonatal acid-base effects, and ephedrine showed the greatest.
Previously phenylephrine infusion has been the consensus recommendation.
Nonetheless, other than ephedrine which should not be a first-choice pressor during Caesarean section, there is not enough evidence to strongly recommend one pressor over another. Clinical familiarity and institutional availability are probably the most important factors when choosing a vasopressor.
summary