• Nutrition · Apr 2013

    Rapid and reliable self-screening for nutritional risk in hospital outpatients using an electronic system.

    • Paula McGurk, John M Jackson, and Marinos Elia.
    • Department of Dietetics Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
    • Nutrition. 2013 Apr 1;29(4):693-6.

    ObjectiveThis study examined an electronic nutritional self-screening procedure for feasibility and for reliability, rapidity, and ease of use by hospital outpatients.MethodsOne hundred sixty consecutive patients (ages 18-87 y) attending a gastroenterology clinic measured their weight and height using a modified digital weight and height machine, which transmitted results to a computer. Following input of reported weight loss in the previous 3 mo to 6 mo, malnutrition risk by the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) was instantaneously calculated. The duration and ease of undertaking screening were noted. Screening also was undertaken by a health care professional.ResultsOf the patients in the study, 21.3% were at risk for malnutrition (medium + high risk). There was perfect agreement (kappa = 1.00) between self-screening and health care professional screening, between test-retest self-screening, and between two methods of measuring height (facing toward and away from the stadiometer). A low within-patient coefficient of variation was found for measurement of weight (<0.2%), height (<0.35%) and body mass index (<0.4%), except for two measurements in which height was recorded before correct positioning of the sliding headpiece. The overall time to self-screen was 1.29 ± 0.57 min but it was 2.81 ± 0.92 min in those aged ≥ 75 y. Of the participants, 96.2% rated self-screening as very easy (71.9%) or easy (24.3%) and 3.8% (predominantly patients ages ≥ 75 y) difficult.ConclusionThe study provides evidence that electronic nutritional self-screening can be rapid, easy, reliable, and feasible in a clinical setting. Equipment specifically designed for self-screening and use in other types of patients and settings could facilitate appropriate and routine implementation of self-screening.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.