• M C Z Novaretti, C R Sopeleti, P E Dorlhiac-Llacer, and D A F Chamone.
• Immunohematology Division, Hematology Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. marcitabrz@yahoo.com
• J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2005 Jan 1; 19 (5): 219-27.

AbstractDrugs can result in broad variety of hematologic abnormalities including positive direct antiglobulin test. In this study, we evaluated gel microcolumn assay for the detection of drug-induced antibodies. Direct antiglobulin test was performed by conventional tube and by gel microcolumn assay in 139 hospitalized patients. Drug in vitro studies were done in 34 patients with positive direct antiglobulin test by tube test and gel microcolumn assay using serum and eluate. None of them had signs of hemolytic anemia. A total of 1,000 blood samples from donors were used as control group. Gel microcolumn assay was more sensitive than in tube test for direct antiglobulin test (P<0.01). Positive direct antiglobulin test was more frequent in patients than in donors (P<0.01). Drug in vitro studies were positive with at least one drug in 76.5% of patients with positive direct antiglobulin test by immune complex and/or adsorption mechanisms. We found a high incidence of positive drug in vitro tests in positive direct antiglobulin test patients. Gel microcolumn assay showed appropriate results for drug in vitro studies. The combination of tube and gel microcolumn assay can improve detection of drug-induced positive direct antiglobulin tests.(c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

16 keywords...

hide…