• World Neurosurg · Feb 2021

    Differentiating non enhancing grade II gliomas from grade III gliomas using diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.

    • Hatham Alkanhal, Kumar Das, Nitika Rathi, Khaja Syed, and Harish Poptani.
    • Centre for Preclinical Imaging, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
    • World Neurosurg. 2021 Feb 1; 146: e555-e564.

    BackgroundContrast enhancement in a brain tumor on magnetic resonance imaging is typically indicative of a high-grade glioma. However, a significant proportion of nonenhancing gliomas can be either grade II or III. While gross total resection remains the primary goal, imaging biomarkers may guide management when surgery is not possible, especially for nonenhancing gliomas. The utility of diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated in differentiating nonenhancing gliomas.MethodsRetrospective analysis was performed on imaging data from 72 nonenhancing gliomas, including grade II (n = 49) and III (n = 23) gliomas. Diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic susceptibility contrast data were used to generate fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity as well as cerebral blood volume, cerebral blood flow, and mean transit time maps. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and area under the curve analyses were used to measure sensitivity and specificity of imaging parameters. A subanalysis was performed to evaluate the utility of imaging parameters in differentiating between different histologic groups.ResultsLogistic regression analysis indicated that tumor volume and relative mean transit time could differentiate between grade II and III nonenhancing gliomas. At a cutoff value of 0.33, this combination provided an area under the curve of 0.71, 70.6% sensitivity, and 64.3% specificity. Logistic regression analyses demonstrated much higher sensitivity and specificity in the differentiation of astrocytomas from oligodendrogliomas or identification of grades within these histologic subtypes.ConclusionsDiffusion tensor imaging and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging can aid in differentiation of nonenhancing grade II and III gliomas and between histologic subtypes.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.