• Spine · Apr 2021

    Lowest Instrumented Vertebra (LIV) Selection in Posterior Cervical Fusion: Does Cervicothoracic Junction LIV Predict Mechanical Failure?

    • Joseph T Labrum, Inamullah Khan, Kristin R Archer, Amir M Abtahi, and Byron F Stephens.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
    • Spine. 2021 Apr 15; 46 (8): E482-E490.

    Study DesignRetrospective.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of posterior cervical fusion lowest instrumented vertebra (PCF LIV) selection on incidence of mechanical failure, revision surgery, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).Summary Of Background DataRecent studies indicate that the LIV in PCF may contribute to the risk of mechanical failure. To date, the evidence available to guide spine surgeons in the selection of PCF LIV remains limited.MethodsAll patients undergoing PCF at a single institution were prospectively entered into a spine registry which was retrospectively queried. Data collection included demographics, pathology, operative variables, construct LIV, outcomes of mechanical failure, revision surgery, and patient-reported disability, pain, and quality of life.ResultsOf 438 patients undergoing PCF from 2006 to 2019, 106 patients had an LIV of C7, T1, or T2, a minimum of 1-year follow-up, and met all study inclusion criteria. LIV cohorts were C7 LIV (36), T1 LIV (42), and T2 LIV (28). There were no between-group differences in patient demographics, operative variables, or postoperative follow-up across the three LIV cohorts. Mechanical failure rates for C7, T1, and T2 LIV were 30.6%, 23.8%, and 0%, respectively (P = 0.007). Revision rates for C7, T1, and T2 LIV were 25.0%, 11.9%, and 0%, respectively (P = 0.013). No difference was noted in average time to revision/failure between C7 (39.68 months) and T1 (29.85 months) LIV cohorts. No differences in baseline, 3-month, and 12-month postoperative PRO measures were noted in the C7 and T1 LIV cohort when compared to the T2 LIV cohort.ConclusionThe findings in this study indicate that PCF LIV selection may play a significant role in the development of mechanical complications and need for revision surgery. T2 LIV selection demonstrated a significantly lower rate of mechanical failure and revision surgery. Postoperative PROs up to 36 months are needed to evaluate effect of LIV selection on PROs.Level of Evidence: 3.Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation  

      Add institutional full text...


    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..


Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
988,657 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.