• Carolin Luise Bohn and Jens Christoph Türp.
• Department für Zahn‑, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
• Schmerz. 2021 Oct 1; 35 (5): 307-314.

BackgroundSince 2017, the diagnosis of patients with orofacial pain at the University Center for Dental Medicine Basel has been supplemented by using standardized image graphics (Dolografie® [Affolter/Rüfenacht, Bern, Switzerland]). For this purpose, patients select from a set of 34 cards those that visually best match their pain and then explain the reason for their choice.Objectives(1) How many cards are selected on average? (2) Do sex and age influence the choice of cards? (3) Are there preferences in the choice of cards? (4) Are there correlations between pain diagnostic categories (e.g., musculoskeletal versus neuropathic orofacial pain) and the cards selected? (4) Are there correlations between pain diagnostic categories (e.g., musculoskeletal versus neuropathic orofacial pain) and the selected cards?MethodsThe available complete pain anamnestic data of 143 patients were evaluated.Results(1) Patients selected an average of 3.5 cards to describe their pain. Up to six cards were sufficient for a detailed description of pain in almost all patients. With the 16 most frequently chosen cards, the majority of patients were able to adequately describe their pain. (2) Sex and age had no influence on the number of selected cards. (3) There were clear preferences: Card 02 was chosen most often (45 times), followed by cards 05 and 13 (27 times each). (4) A differentiating choice was made most clearly in neuropathic pain by a strong preference for card 28 and a disregard of card 18.ConclusionThe use of standardized image cards as a "visual communication tool" has proven to be a time-efficient procedure in the context of history taking, which helps to obtain clinically relevant information not previously expressed by the patient.© 2021. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

10 keywords...

hide…