• Spine · Sep 2013

    Antagonistic role of vertebral translation against vertebral rotation in the spontaneous postoperative modulation of the anterior chest wall contour in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

    • Bang-ping Qian, Sai-hu Mao, Ze-zhang Zhu, Feng Zhu, Zhen Liu, Lei-lei Xu, Bing Wang, Yang Yu, and Yong Qiu.
    • From the Department of Spine Surgery, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
    • Spine. 2013 Sep 1;38(19):E1201-8.

    Study DesignA computed tomography study.ObjectiveTo identify the best scoliotic deformity components that show impact upon the spontaneous postoperative modulation of the deformed anterior chest wall contour in right convex thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Summary Of Background DataSpontaneous postoperative aggravation of the anterior concave costal projection was a common occurrence in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, yet the risk factors that effectively bridged the gap between what the surgeons did in the interior and how the rib cages reacted on the exterior were still open to debate.MethodsPre- and postoperative computed tomographic scans of 77 patients with right convex thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were retrieved and analyzed. According to the postoperative variation of anterior chest wall angle (CWA), the patients were divided into 2 groups with either aggravated or improved CWA. Multiple scoliotic deformity parameters and their surgical correction rates were evaluated, correlated, and then compared between the 2 groups. Moreover, patients with apex located at T9 were isolated and evaluated independently. A logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictors of the spontaneous postoperative modulation of the anterior chest wall contour.ResultsThe surgical correction rate of Cobb angle (supine), the rotational angle with respect to the sagittal plane (RAsag angle), the rotational angle with respect to the anterior midline of the body (RAml angle), the angle of lateral deviation of the apical vertebrae from the midline (MLdev angle), the posterior hemithorax ratio, the vertebral translation (VT), and the thoracic rotation averaged 64.6%, 19.5%, 30.8%, 39.2%, 15.0%, 41.2%, and 28.7%, respectively. Ratio of aggravated anterior chest wall contour was the highest at the T7 apex group (84.6%) as compared with T8 apex group (47.1%), T9 apex group (19.5%), and T10 apex group (0.0%). The preoperative CWA was significantly lower in the aggravated CWA group when compared with the improved group (2.1 ± 1.8°vs. 6.6 ± 2.4°, P < 0.001). Besides, in the aggravated CWA group, significantly greater surgical correction of VT and lesser correction of RAsag angle were demonstrated when compared with the improved CWA group (VT: 53.0% vs. 34.8%, P = 0.001; RAsag: 2.5% vs. 28.7%, P = 0.000). In the T9 subgroup, remarkably different correction rate of VT and RAsag were similarly observed (VT: 54.9% vs. 35.3%, P = 0.046; RAsag: 4.9% vs. 23.5%, P = 0.034). In terms of other deformity parameters, no significantly different correction rate was consistently detected. In the logistic regression analysis, apex location, CWA, and correction rate of RAsag were demonstrated to be independent factors predictive of the alteration of chest wall contour.ConclusionIn addition to the smaller preoperative CWA and higher apex location, lesser correction of vertebral rotation, if accompanied by great surgical correction of apical VT, could also largely result in a poor postoperative anterior chest wall contour.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…